Flat Earth is fascinating. No idea if its accurate or not. But the arguments presented are often compelling, and the generally accepted counterarguments are often overly complex babble. That is what bugs me. Nobidy seems to refute you guys in plain English, its always some incomprehensible explanation im supposed to accept because its in a textbook at Harvard. Maybe I'm just unable to grasp it. But I still haven't counted out you Flat Earthers.
It is pretty basic. Infrared cameras and high powered camera lens over water prove it. The basic concept of what you see can be difficult to grasp because you have seen it your entire life while being told what you is something else. There is always a horizontal vanishing point that you are told is a curve. What you never see is a curve/bend/rise/hill in the water that would obscure where the base of an object such as an oil platform or wind turbine meets the water surface.
Flat Earth is fascinating. No idea if its accurate or not. But the arguments presented are often compelling, and the generally accepted counterarguments are often overly complex babble. That is what bugs me. Nobidy seems to refute you guys in plain English, its always some incomprehensible explanation im supposed to accept because its in a textbook at Harvard. Maybe I'm just unable to grasp it. But I still haven't counted out you Flat Earthers.
It is pretty basic. Infrared cameras and high powered camera lens over water prove it. The basic concept of what you see can be difficult to grasp because you have seen it your entire life while being told what you is something else. There is always a horizontal vanishing point that you are told is a curve. What you never see is a curve/bend/rise/hill in the water that would obscure where the base of an object such as an oil platform or wind turbine meets the water surface.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_HvE_Oy3TaU
https://www.bitchute.com/video/1kAAGAnQ3Wlz/