I like this theory because it also explains why the VAERS data tensioned fairly high fidelity unlike other sources which are highly manipulated: they needed the info to interpret results of experiments. It's food for us to reserve, of course, that these vaccines remain experimental to this day.
They are thought to be experimental only because most don't know they were thoroughly tested for the past few decades to make them into the perfect bio weapons.
Not a doctor, but I've shared this before. My father takes meds for sarcadosis. Not a single reaction to the Pfitzer shots. His autoimmune system treated the spike proteins like they would treat the sarcadosis.
No wonder having batch number in vax cards is important to them. And no wonder the vaxes were not fully certified by the FDA, if composition can vary so much.
I do contract engineering. Some time ago I saw various job notices for bioengineers by the vax companies looking for engineers to come in, work, and document their vax production processes. That is odd, because normally this is handled by internal people, and the processes are fairly stable. Although bioreactors have to be fine tuned. But if you are frequently changing the batches, perhaps now you need someone on top of that, and if you later have to deny what you are doing, you use disposable personnel so that you can deny your (direct) employees did anything. I always thought the job descriptions were a bit odd because they implied nonstandard ways of operating. Several of the GMO/DNA companies we have in the Bay Area were hiring for it, which made me suspicious because it was more than one company suddenly doing it. These companies provide components to sell to the vax mfrs (the mfrs do not all make all their own materials).
In particular, nanotech in vaxes may be made by outside companies specializing in it. So for instance, Pfizer might not have nanotech engineers on staff nor make silicon chips or (carbon?) nanochips themselves; they probably buy it and mix it in. A vax is kind of like a blended whiskey - it's not all one substance and you kind of need a brew meister. My guess is that one secret company makes the nanotech and then all vax cos get it. So that way you can put the same Bluetooth ID means in all vaxes.
Bioreactors are exactly like what goes on with alcohol production. There can be batch variations. There can be contamination. Sometimes a batch goes bad. There needs to be stringent quality control or you end up with batches like in the past where viruses were not weakened properly (one of Gates' companies had this) and some third world country got vaxes that harmed the recipients for life.
Yeah and we've already got data that the mRNA in these arm pokes is highly unstable and they were having issues with a lot of degraded and fragmented mRNA. I am not clear on what kind of dangers such batches might pose and have not been able to find much info on it. With these kinds of vaccines being relatively new, there may be no way to know yet for sure.
Can you tl/dr the supposed new leaked docs that show there are killed batches? Cuz what I see is dozens of hours of video and links, most or all of which seems to consist of older news. Yes it's been out for a while now that certain batches contain almost all of the side effects reports. That could mean those batches are just too strong and the other batches are weak and much safer or it could mean that certain batches are crap for other reasons like crap manufacturing or even that other things in them, but it is not automatic proof of totally killed batches as the only possible cause. Your title seems to suggest you have some new and hacked info on this subject, can you link directly to this info? Most of what you linked looks to be older info and not from any recent hacks. As much as I don't trust the arm pokes, I also think it's important that we be truthful about any data we do have.
I like this theory because it also explains why the VAERS data tensioned fairly high fidelity unlike other sources which are highly manipulated: they needed the info to interpret results of experiments. It's food for us to reserve, of course, that these vaccines remain experimental to this day.
They are thought to be experimental only because most don't know they were thoroughly tested for the past few decades to make them into the perfect bio weapons.
Haha, way to do a plot twist at the end!
Not a doctor, but I've shared this before. My father takes meds for sarcadosis. Not a single reaction to the Pfitzer shots. His autoimmune system treated the spike proteins like they would treat the sarcadosis.
No wonder having batch number in vax cards is important to them. And no wonder the vaxes were not fully certified by the FDA, if composition can vary so much.
I do contract engineering. Some time ago I saw various job notices for bioengineers by the vax companies looking for engineers to come in, work, and document their vax production processes. That is odd, because normally this is handled by internal people, and the processes are fairly stable. Although bioreactors have to be fine tuned. But if you are frequently changing the batches, perhaps now you need someone on top of that, and if you later have to deny what you are doing, you use disposable personnel so that you can deny your (direct) employees did anything. I always thought the job descriptions were a bit odd because they implied nonstandard ways of operating. Several of the GMO/DNA companies we have in the Bay Area were hiring for it, which made me suspicious because it was more than one company suddenly doing it. These companies provide components to sell to the vax mfrs (the mfrs do not all make all their own materials).
In particular, nanotech in vaxes may be made by outside companies specializing in it. So for instance, Pfizer might not have nanotech engineers on staff nor make silicon chips or (carbon?) nanochips themselves; they probably buy it and mix it in. A vax is kind of like a blended whiskey - it's not all one substance and you kind of need a brew meister. My guess is that one secret company makes the nanotech and then all vax cos get it. So that way you can put the same Bluetooth ID means in all vaxes.
I'd be shocked if they could have ramped up production to billions of doses worth any kind of quality control.
Bioreactors are exactly like what goes on with alcohol production. There can be batch variations. There can be contamination. Sometimes a batch goes bad. There needs to be stringent quality control or you end up with batches like in the past where viruses were not weakened properly (one of Gates' companies had this) and some third world country got vaxes that harmed the recipients for life.
This whole US vax effort was a shitshow.
Yeah and we've already got data that the mRNA in these arm pokes is highly unstable and they were having issues with a lot of degraded and fragmented mRNA. I am not clear on what kind of dangers such batches might pose and have not been able to find much info on it. With these kinds of vaccines being relatively new, there may be no way to know yet for sure.
Can you tl/dr the supposed new leaked docs that show there are killed batches? Cuz what I see is dozens of hours of video and links, most or all of which seems to consist of older news. Yes it's been out for a while now that certain batches contain almost all of the side effects reports. That could mean those batches are just too strong and the other batches are weak and much safer or it could mean that certain batches are crap for other reasons like crap manufacturing or even that other things in them, but it is not automatic proof of totally killed batches as the only possible cause. Your title seems to suggest you have some new and hacked info on this subject, can you link directly to this info? Most of what you linked looks to be older info and not from any recent hacks. As much as I don't trust the arm pokes, I also think it's important that we be truthful about any data we do have.
Dysgenia is a side effect of generational inbreeding. Which describes how one becomes a Trump supporter in the first place.
Lol k
It's taking too long for my patience.
The websites to obtain this information are:
How Bad is My Batch? https://howbad.info/
and the mirror site:
How Bad is My Batch? https://howbadismybatch.com/
LOL HaCkErS!
Cute.
Kill yourself faggot