I read all this SH/AJ saga as consistent with AJ being controlled opposition all along. You would think that, if in earnest, Jones would exhibit evidence of the hoax in the public record of a court of law, or if the courts were corrupted, use Infowars to exhibit evidence of such corruption of the courts.
But what did we get? "Oh, you're right. It happened just however they say it did and I can't talk any more about it. Sorry!"
After close examination of the Rittenhouse case, I concluded that his attorneys were "in on it" while Kyle was not. There were very obvious observations and questions I had after very little research that had seemingly totally escaped them.
But then again, I don't know why any of us would think lawyers should somehow be assumed to be honest players in these events. Seems quite dumb, actually, after counting up the lawyers in DC alone.
I read all this SH/AJ saga as consistent with AJ being controlled opposition all along. You would think that, if in earnest, Jones would exhibit evidence of the hoax in the public record of a court of law, or if the courts were corrupted, use Infowars to exhibit evidence of such corruption of the courts.
But what did we get? "Oh, you're right. It happened just however they say it did and I can't talk any more about it. Sorry!"
Robert Barnes is his attorney. He probably told Jones to not say anything else so he can take the hit and rebound faster.
After close examination of the Rittenhouse case, I concluded that his attorneys were "in on it" while Kyle was not. There were very obvious observations and questions I had after very little research that had seemingly totally escaped them.
But then again, I don't know why any of us would think lawyers should somehow be assumed to be honest players in these events. Seems quite dumb, actually, after counting up the lawyers in DC alone.