Really all they are seeing is liver injury but calling it viral. I'm not someone who denies all viral pathogens exist, but I do believe Hepatitis C is another hoax.
the late Nick Regush, at ABC News. He had serious questions about hepatitis C.
In his weekly column, he wrote:
"Consider this a challenge in progress. This scientific adventure raises the question of whether the hepatitis C virus, blamed for a major silent epidemic of liver disease and even cancer, actually exists.
That's right. You read this correctly: I am raising a question that may disturb scientists and hepatitis C patients alike. But I'm raising it anyway because it is vital to do so in the interests of public health.
I'm issuing a challenge to the scientific community to present me with the published, peer-reviewed scientific evidence that such a virus actually exists - namely that it has been properly isolated, according to accepted, fundamental principles of virology."
Really all they are seeing is liver injury but calling it viral. I'm not someone who denies all viral pathogens exist, but I do believe Hepatitis C is another hoax.
There was a theory about it a long time ago, even one written by a fairly respected mainsream journalist. https://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/ciencia/ciencia_virus33.htm