I mean he's not exactly free from implication I'd illegal business dealings. I really hope he's right but a part of me feels like this is controlled op- corralling resistance to associate with "known enemies of the state" to justify broadening surveillance.
I mean he's not exactly free from implication I'd illegal business dealings. I really hope he's right but a part of me feels like this is controlled op- corralling resistance to associate with "known enemies of the state" to justify broadening surveillance.