Because it can be found on YouTube, if you know exactly what you're looking for, that means it's not suppressed technology? What kind of logic is that exactly?
You have lamented that service providers have blocked videos from your video host and that there is an alternative host while deliberately leaving out the simple fact that what you have repackaged is on YouTube by the original uploader and does not seem to suffer from any blockage issues. You are using these alternative platforms to deceive us unto thinking those videos have been scrubbed, depriving the video creator of revenue in the process. You yourself said that this topic was "one of the largest, most aggressive conspiracies ever."
The device you posted is not an engine that powers itself. According to the video, it uses well over 175 feet of steel wire (and presumably an additional equal amount of copper wire) to power one blinking LED light for a limited time. In fact, it could very well be that that YouTube channel was set up to demonstrate just how impractical these "hidden technologies" are to implement. I've seen DIY solar content out there that I thought was paid for by energy companies to dissuade people from using solar power.
You also have a habit of using excessive technical jargon in ways that lead me to believe you are trolling. Even your username is suspect.
I said nothing about the video being blocked. I explained that the catbox.moe site has been blocked by some service providers due to censorship, which may be the reason the people who asked couldn't load it.
Okay. That's fair. I still think you were trying to give this a veneer of being hard to find information.
THIS IS THE MOST SIMPLE DEVICE WHICH DEMONSTRATES EFFECTS THAT AREN'T ACKNOWLEDGED BY MAINSTREAM SCIENCE.
I don't think that's correct. It is a battery and the electromagnetism is from electrical current (generated by the battery) being coiled around the iron core. None of that is disputed by mainstream science.
Trying to pass off what I say as "excessive technical jargon" and trolling just because it goes over your head, is rather pathetic.
You are writing that way to build credibility. Either that or you and some bros in a discord somewhere are laughing at us "trusting TheScience."
This is on YouTube and not suppressed by any means.
How To Build A Nathan Stubblefield Coil Parts 1-5 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xsuw12Qr8wk https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=28zBEvu5_g4 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tD06J9IpbAA https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O6a4goOGrgo https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jLL7YKO7q8c
You have lamented that service providers have blocked videos from your video host and that there is an alternative host while deliberately leaving out the simple fact that what you have repackaged is on YouTube by the original uploader and does not seem to suffer from any blockage issues. You are using these alternative platforms to deceive us unto thinking those videos have been scrubbed, depriving the video creator of revenue in the process. You yourself said that this topic was "one of the largest, most aggressive conspiracies ever."
The device you posted is not an engine that powers itself. According to the video, it uses well over 175 feet of steel wire (and presumably an additional equal amount of copper wire) to power one blinking LED light for a limited time. In fact, it could very well be that that YouTube channel was set up to demonstrate just how impractical these "hidden technologies" are to implement. I've seen DIY solar content out there that I thought was paid for by energy companies to dissuade people from using solar power.
You also have a habit of using excessive technical jargon in ways that lead me to believe you are trolling. Even your username is suspect.
Okay. That's fair. I still think you were trying to give this a veneer of being hard to find information.
I don't think that's correct. It is a battery and the electromagnetism is from electrical current (generated by the battery) being coiled around the iron core. None of that is disputed by mainstream science.
You are writing that way to build credibility. Either that or you and some bros in a discord somewhere are laughing at us "trusting TheScience."