https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/tv9eua/hey_disney_gay_people_cant_make_children/
take a look at the comments
this is the CONSPIRACY SUB ffs
wtf...
seems like disney is paying a nice internet army to maintain its PR good
the same users being pro globotranny on that thread also are provaks, such as this one: https://www.reddit.com/user/Popular_Ad4115/
What is that definition. Because female to male transition can. They often keep their womb changing their genitals only. And can be done by insemination and cesarean. Very costly and not without health huge risks, like immune compromised, and huge regression. But has been done. Gay people can make children, they still have functioning organs, mostly choosing surrogates, donors, and insemination. Currently the science is trying to provide male birth. It can, unethically, by cloning. Where artificial wombs have been created even from embryos. But this tech is very dark. Although we are seeing increasing signs of it today with much younger fetuses being born by machines. But male's birthing is still impossible last time we all checked, despite it being put into the medical journal as theory, and it possibly even being attempted on animals, like mice, but you won't fully find it on humans yet, because it's very dark. China I believe has done a lot of this shit and recently. Mice male birth, successful birth dead mice, and including in a completely artificial womb to birth.
I hate shills and not having debates. It should be challenged or talked about. I am here to provide any facts I know and have read about. Even though I really hate this topic, personally I find it unethical.
Are you trans?
What kind of question is that? Are you nuts. No, of course not.
I presented where the current science is at on a conspiracy sub. They are really fucking around with it. Away from simply animals. It actually gets much darker. Where potential clones, human, go back much further. Find it.
I am not here to be corralled like dumb livestock into blind agreement. I don't agree, just because an idiot tells me too. I don't expect dumb questions. Topically I made my position clear, unethical. There are a few reasons for this. Simply because without biological identification, it's rape without consent. Also the fact they are now hurting women's chances at fair competition. They are causing problems dividing society's fairness. They present problems. Society is also banning smoking. But degenerative drugs like estrogen causing cancer and other hormones directly compromising immunity are being promoted. An addiction to lifelong medicines and expensive therapy. Where everybody else sooner pays far more for. Oxymoronic. Regardless of the fact most are quite unstable, predatory, or simply nuts, often sociopathic. Although it's their choice, but are they being correctly informed, or are they simply guinea pigs advancing science? Where that science gets real dark in its test subjects. But it doesn't mean that ignorance is correct either. Hence I simply stated facts.
I was just checking. Good answer.
Haha, are you a trans? See how that works. It's mildly offensive. All male, and I wouldn't change it.
Let idiots do what they must. But there needs to be much better choices on how they impact the rest of us. Because currently by simply assuming genders, they're creating a much bigger societal divide.