IQ is a bullshit test. It means only towards a standard of teaching apparent with other such education systems. By comparison to their environment how have they adapted. You can presume unintelligent, because it is without educational literacy. In likewise comparisons of perhaps survival, what is intelligence, how has it faired? Hence IQ is a wrongful assumption.
Needless to say there are huge gaps in IQ. An easier assumption is that neither fairs well in contrary environments, not without adopting more than IQ.
Please test it, put Einstein in the jungle, now put a moron from the jungle, back into that jungle. What went wrong. IQ obviously.
The debate gains greater traction of what has shaped since an evolutionary model, how any civilizations have advanced around it. Tired debates based on the assumptions of provided literacy.
IQ is a bullshit test. It means only towards a standard of teaching apparent with other such education systems. By comparison to their environment how have they adapted. You can presume unintelligent, because it is without educational literacy. In likewise comparisons of perhaps survival, what is intelligence, how has it faired? Hence IQ is a wrongful assumption.
This would be true, only if blacks in places outside of Africa didn’t themselves have significantly lower IQs than whites,Asians, and browns in the same country. So OP’s point still stands.
They don't actually. Since diversity pushes, poor background white males are fairing much worse by comparisons of education. In places like the UK. Although that average is still down by larger proportions. And much more is propaganda. But I can bring it up. Whites from poorer backgrounds are becoming neglected by larger proportions within certain nations.
Again I know plenty of smart people who are as dumb as planks. They're simply smart by educational standards but are clueless at being practical. They simply would not adapt without the Internet.
IQ tests don't mean much. Intelligence is also the ability to adapt. Not simply use technology. It is by much larger degrees making the population much dumber. Today's tech is causing autism in much larger proportions. Skills are faster being replaced, stuff that was once an education a few decades ago like sewing, machine repairing, growing and planting, woodworking, etc etc. Until they're specialist subjects, not many gain averages at. Replaced by consumption and
a reliance solely on technology, causing bigger problems. No longer reading, no longer articulating, or learning much apart from expenditure. Sure they might be smart enough to master a preferred status, it doesn't reflect intelligence.
Your sole argument is on educational standards. It is asserting from dominance the need to sell technology and education, because it facilitates the demand. Real clever.
They don't actually. Since diversity pushes, poor background white males are fairing much worse by comparisons of education. In places like the UK. Although that average is still down by larger proportions. And much more is propaganda. But I can bring it up. Whites from poorer backgrounds are becoming neglected by larger proportions within certain nations.
Do you have sources for this, literally everything I look at testifies to the fact that blacks have worse scores, and higher crimes rates than whites and Asians that are in the same class range as them.
Your sole argument is on educational standards. It is asserting from dominance the need to sell technology and education, because it facilitates the demand. Real clever.
Not true, I’m also saying the lack of iq among blacks also contributes to higher crime rates, and fatherless rates.
IQ is a bullshit test. It means only towards a standard of teaching apparent with other such education systems. By comparison to their environment how have they adapted. You can presume unintelligent, because it is without educational literacy. In likewise comparisons of perhaps survival, what is intelligence, how has it faired? Hence IQ is a wrongful assumption.
Needless to say there are huge gaps in IQ. An easier assumption is that neither fairs well in contrary environments, not without adopting more than IQ.
Please test it, put Einstein in the jungle, now put a moron from the jungle, back into that jungle. What went wrong. IQ obviously.
The debate gains greater traction of what has shaped since an evolutionary model, how any civilizations have advanced around it. Tired debates based on the assumptions of provided literacy.
Ultimately who cares?
This would be true, only if blacks in places outside of Africa didn’t themselves have significantly lower IQs than whites,Asians, and browns in the same country. So OP’s point still stands.
They don't actually. Since diversity pushes, poor background white males are fairing much worse by comparisons of education. In places like the UK. Although that average is still down by larger proportions. And much more is propaganda. But I can bring it up. Whites from poorer backgrounds are becoming neglected by larger proportions within certain nations.
Again I know plenty of smart people who are as dumb as planks. They're simply smart by educational standards but are clueless at being practical. They simply would not adapt without the Internet.
IQ tests don't mean much. Intelligence is also the ability to adapt. Not simply use technology. It is by much larger degrees making the population much dumber. Today's tech is causing autism in much larger proportions. Skills are faster being replaced, stuff that was once an education a few decades ago like sewing, machine repairing, growing and planting, woodworking, etc etc. Until they're specialist subjects, not many gain averages at. Replaced by consumption and a reliance solely on technology, causing bigger problems. No longer reading, no longer articulating, or learning much apart from expenditure. Sure they might be smart enough to master a preferred status, it doesn't reflect intelligence.
Your sole argument is on educational standards. It is asserting from dominance the need to sell technology and education, because it facilitates the demand. Real clever.
Do you have sources for this, literally everything I look at testifies to the fact that blacks have worse scores, and higher crimes rates than whites and Asians that are in the same class range as them.
Not true, I’m also saying the lack of iq among blacks also contributes to higher crime rates, and fatherless rates.
Blocked.