What do you think is up with that? I kept mentally nudging him to spill part 2 out but he never did and clammed up almost as if he read my thoughts and did a big U turn NOPE with a nasty grin. I wonder if there might be an inner mental war going on and I might have tried 'too hard' and caused the opposite? Same when he almost revealed JFK and at one time he was going to 'downsize' the TSA and remove a bunch at small airports but caved in to the left when they said he was going to let terrorist 'Walk right in' our airports if he did that.
Towards the end Trump seemed to have lost his backbone but suddenly is gaining it back for 2024?
Or perhaps he never intended to spill the secrets and just led us on but what would he have to gain doing that since he only took 1$ of pay so he didn't exactly get extra rich from being the President and certainly didn't get extra rich standing up to China which if he had any previous ties they'd cut him off or he wouldn't have stood up.
I always assume that, on issues like this where I'm confused and there are apparent contradictions, there is more information relevant to it of which I am not aware. So I have to work harder, dig deeper, expand my imagination, and review previous conclusions until I have dispelled the confusion and resolved the contradictions. I may choose to reserve judgment until the such information becomes available.
And while it's not a direct answer to your question, you may wish to consider a related question, one that I certainly posed to myself: "What good would it have done if he had spilled the beans on 9/11 or any other similar subject?" I would suggest you think about how much good it does when you "spill the beans" to friends, family, colleagues, and rabid political enemies who aren't already deeply into conspiracy (which I assume would be most).
Or you can go with the shill answer, which I'll give you here: "oRaNgE mAn CoNtRoLlEd Op! YoU'rE dUmB iF yOu DoN't GeT tHaT!"
He certainly knows what is going. Look at the Al Smith dinner.
It's basically like everyone in the crowd knew exactly what he was referring to in his "roast" of Hillary Clinton, and not in the way that a "normie" would think of it.
And even a CARDINAL was laughing it off. Who just happened to be sitting next to Clinton.
Yeah, I'd say most of the people at that dinner (such as the Knights of Malta) aren't deeply INTO conspiracy, but are the conspirators.
That was my reaction as well.
Still think he may be the Antichrist. In terms of opposition in personality to Jesus I'd say he's a good fit. And he may not even be a bad guy per se...it's a role to be fulfilled.
It's actually more interesting when you think in terms of the media harping on Trump well after his term was over. And of course people saying that Biden isn't really president, hence the fake sets and whatnot.
I think anyone would agree that Trump was a bit of an aberration.
There is weird crap going on with Biden's fake sets and you NEVER EVER see him with his wife where President's cannot stand being without!