I'm not too much of a follower myself. You can't learn the secrets of this world by simply one person. You have to learn from multiple individuals of multiple different backgrounds. Finding the extraordinary individual is difficult. By creating followers, they can lead them. That's my best assumption. Hit the follow, like and subscribe button for me. That's exactly what they say. Don't do that for me, block me if you'd like. It's your decision.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (10)
sorted by:
So you're still a follower, just of multiple people?
Why is everything about following and relying on somebody else?
Why can't we simply think for ourselves, and accept when told we're feeling instead of thinking?
The whole reason school teaches you science and write papers is so you're able to understand on your own.
An expert isn't always right.
Someone putting together a word salad that gets you excited isn't necessarily telling you the truth.
Are you attempting to make me a leader? Don't know if I can do that. It's difficult, and I find the treasure in the unsung heros.
Sounds like you are able to listen. A great skill that will get you far. Nobody listens, the mind works 10 times faster than a person speaks. While you are talking, most are thinking what they are going to say next. Listening is a great attribute to have, it's rare. Also, if you seek wisdom, read proverbs.
Everything is perceived; not suggested by others within. Life perceives being moved from inception towards death; hence being the formed choice within the momentum (balance) of that ongoing flow.
Choice within balance implies the need to resist the temptation to want to ignore resisting.
Choice doesn't need to rely on the suggested choices of others; it needs to respond to balance (need/want); while resisting the suggested imbalance (want vs not want) by the choices of others.
To think implies response to input; yet as choice that implies both perceived inspiration (need) and suggested information (want). Choice as the response-ability within balance is demanded to choose need over want; yet is tempted to choose want over need. Others exploit the ignorance of the former (need over want) by suggesting the latter (want over need), and consent to the suggestion of others represents choice (consent) to choice (suggestion) contract law; which is in ignorance of balance (offer) to choice (response) natural law.
That's the foundation for the whole "inversion" racket...want over need instead of need over want. Those who fall for it are corrupting the comprehension of perceived inspiration with the accumulation of suggested information within their mind (memory).
"accept when told" represents consent by choice to suggestion by choice of others; hence submission to the will of others; while ignoring the required will for the sustenance of self.
Feelings aka EMO'TION, noun [Latin emotio; emoveo, to move from.] ignores being moved by; hence being form (life) within flow (inception towards death). Both wanted and not wanted emotions are tempting one to into imbalance (want versus not want); while ignoring balance (need/want).
a) understanding represents standing under the suggested information by others; hence submitting to them; while ignoring ones own free will of choice. Those who want you to understand are domesticating your free will of choice through suggestion.
Under natural law...growing comprehension (compressed within one out of perceived all) is based on choice adapting to perceived balance; while resisting suggested choices by others.
b) to teach self equals to learn for self and vice versa.
c) SCI'ENCE, noun [Latin scientia, from scio, to know.] aka knowledge - "perceived inspiration" cannot be shared; for it's already offered at any moment to each ONE (form) within ALL (flow).
The parasitic few suggested scientism to invert perceived inspiration with suggested information. Besides the aforementioned contract law (choice to choice); their main tool of subversion represents suggested information (word) of perceived inspiration (sound).
These words "insane person" represent suggested meaning; which deceives those consenting to them to ignore the perceived meaning implied within "in sanus" (within sound) + "per sonos" (by sound) aka being within; by and therefore in response to perceivable sound as the choice based resonance (need) or dissonance (want) to it.
d) reason represents the want versus not want conflict; caused by consent to want or not want any suggested information. The parasitic few use suggestion (-isms) to cause division (reason) among the many; which allows them control over both sides of every conflict.
Whatever one reasons about is being defined only by those who suggested what you are reasoning about. Changing sides within reason doesn't change your position within imbalance (conflict) aka want vs not want...both ignore need.
The few not only define what the ignorant many are reasoning over; they redefine the sides of the conflict (from want vs not want to true vs false; believing vs not believing; capitalism vs communism; rich vs poor; right-wing vs left-wing; nationalism vs internationalism; McD vs Burger King; white vs black and so on. Furthermore; to keep the conflicts of reason going; they suggest contradictions to both sides (talmduic reasoning); thereby fueling the reasoning to sustain the suggestions that came before. Example..over half a century of pro-life vs pro-choice reasoning is what sustains the suggested "abortion" racket ever since, and the ignorant many also ignore the notice of liability within "pro-life vs pro-choice"..."life equals choice".
a) right implies versus wrong aka a conflict of reason (want vs not want imbalance); which is caused by consenting to ignore perceived need/want balance) for suggested moralism aka suggested restrictions upon behavior of choice; which ignores being "free" will of choice" in response to the "dom"inance of balance aka free-dom.
b) EXPERT', adjective [Latin expertus, from experior, to try.] - "taught by use" aka learning by doing aka responding as choice to perceived balance.
If one comprehends perceived sound; then whatever others shape by choice into suggestible words; still expresses the perceived sound to the one with eyes to see aka the one who chooses perceived (need) over suggested (want).