a) CEN'TURY, noun [Latin centuria, from centum, a hundred.] - "any thing consisting of a hundred parts"..."a division of the Roman people for the purpose of electing magistrates and enacting laws"
b) if choice (evaluation) represents the CENTer of perceived balance (value); then why the fuck would I give a fuck about the suggested cents of others?
c) percentage aka per (by) center (choice)...nope; it's as "free" will of choice in response to the "dom"inance of balance (aka free-dom).
Lying to Humans
a) HUMAN; noun (hebrew; form) and ANIMAL; noun (Latin anima; animated aka flow) represent allegories for being form (life) within flow (inception towards death).
b) consider if suggesting affixed information as "truth" allows those suggesting it to easily contradict it as suggested "lies". Next; consider if rebranding want vs not want into truth vs lies; changes the choice underneath? Next, try going into any of these truth vs false conflicts and choose (want vs not want) to change sides...would you consider what you're then advocating for as a lie or would it become a truth for you? If truth vs lies is too hot to handle for you; start with right vs wrong within a right-wing vs left-wing political conflict.
c) as form within flow; one can only ever perceive constant change...not define any truth by slapping a label onto a moving system. Nature neither lies; not does it label anything as truth.
propagandizing
Suggestion of information towards consenting free will of choice.
monetary systems
Choice (ones responding evaluation) to Balance (all perceivable value)...what would happen if choice chooses the suggested value by the choice of others; while ignoring the perceived value of balance? Could ignoring need/want for want vs not want represents an imbalance?
Can there be a higher value within all existence than evaluation?
the information age...
...represents the ignorance of perceived inspiration (from within spirit) for suggested information (from within form).
"Sweet Dreams are made of these...who am I to disagree"? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qeMFqkcPYcg
a) CEN'TURY, noun [Latin centuria, from centum, a hundred.] - "any thing consisting of a hundred parts"..."a division of the Roman people for the purpose of electing magistrates and enacting laws"
b) if choice (evaluation) represents the CENTer of perceived balance (value); then why the fuck would I give a fuck about the suggested cents of others?
c) percentage aka per (by) center (choice)...nope; it's as "free" will of choice in response to the "dom"inance of balance (aka free-dom).
a) HUMAN; noun (hebrew; form) and ANIMAL; noun (Latin anima; animated aka flow) represent allegories for being form (life) within flow (inception towards death).
b) consider if suggesting affixed information as "truth" allows those suggesting it to easily contradict it as suggested "lies". Next; consider if rebranding want vs not want into truth vs lies; changes the choice underneath? Next, try going into any of these truth vs false conflicts and choose (want vs not want) to change sides...would you consider what you're then advocating for as a lie or would it become a truth for you? If truth vs lies is too hot to handle for you; start with right vs wrong within a right-wing vs left-wing political conflict.
c) as form within flow; one can only ever perceive constant change...not define any truth by slapping a label onto a moving system. Nature neither lies; not does it label anything as truth.
Suggestion of information towards consenting free will of choice.
Choice (ones responding evaluation) to Balance (all perceivable value)...what would happen if choice chooses the suggested value by the choice of others; while ignoring the perceived value of balance? Could ignoring need/want for want vs not want represents an imbalance?
Can there be a higher value within all existence than evaluation?
...represents the ignorance of perceived inspiration (from within spirit) for suggested information (from within form).