It's like politics.. if you choose a side, now the other side hates you.
The few suggest (want over need); the many consent by either wanting or not wanting the suggested; which puts them into the want versus not want conflict against each other.
This represents division (want vs not want) by suggestion (want over need). What does need represent? Perceived (inspiration) over suggested (information).
choose a side
Before one can choose a side; one IS the choice based response to perceived balance (need/want). Choosing a suggested side implies want vs not want; while ignoring need for want beforehand.
There's nothing to click.
Because you already consented to be on their side; to use their suggested internet; to want or not want their suggested information.
So.. trying to be "buddies" with somebody.. it gets into this turf.
Agreement versus disagreement (trying to be buddies) does not represents communication; but a "versus" conflict among choices consenting to a suggestion to conflict; versus; reason; want vs not want; imbalance etc. about. Meanwhile; choice represents the response to perceived balance; while being tempted by the suggested choices of others.
The turf that suggestion tempt one into represents imbalance; which is caused by the choice to ignore perceived balance beforehand. The different "turds" ignore the same origin of choice...balance aka momentum within motion for form (life) within flow (inception towards death).
You are tricked by the few who rebrand the want vs not want choice into Russia vs Ukraine; vaxxed vs unvaxxed; right-wing vs left-wing; AMD vs Intel; capitalism vs communism; us vs them; true vs false and so on. Underneath all those suggested labels operates the same want vs not want choice you make upon anything suggested to you. Through this rebranding (revisionism) are the parasitic few selling the narratives to the ignorant many.
how about being a fucking parent
PA'RENT, noun (Latin parens, from pario, to produce or bring forth). The foundation for production implies flow (inception towards death) bringing forth form (life). So to raise the seed of ONE (form) within the soil of ALL (flow) requires adaptation to perceived momentum (balance); while resisting suggested choices tempting imbalance.
The child is tempted to want or not want what the parents suggest; while the parents have to sustain self (individual blood and collective bloodline) within momentum by choosing to adapt to need over want. This is where the parents have to question how the child can resist the temptation of falling for suggestions; as to allow him to adapt to what inspires. If you as the parent choose to adapt to inspiration (need) over information (want), then the child is going to mimic and resonate with it.
To not do things that they don't like.
Try to spot the underlying conflict of reason first...like vs don't like; good vs bad. Once again a rebranding of want vs not want, and only those who suggest what you want or not want, hold the power (your consent) to define; redefine and contradict it at will for you.
Question any notable "winnings" for reason within the suggested his-story of mankind? Then question the use of "agree to disagree" by those who simply seek confirmation for participation in a conflict that cannot be won; since consent to an outside suggestion defines it being fought. Half a century of pro-life (want) vs pro-choice (not want) is what keeps the suggestion of "abortion" going unopposed.
Just on to post something about cheap food prices when all the rest are rising, and how those items are probably more poisoned.
Question reasoning (want vs not want) about suggested food or using the implication (if/then) as inspiration to grow your own food?
Same with the stuff you read from me. Resist the temptation to want vs not want to understand it. Instead ask yourself...how can I grow by using it as implication; instead of feeling overwhelmed trying to figure out what it means?
The way you write represents you adapting to inspiration; while putting it into your own perspective. Keep doing that, but also resist the temptation of all the information suggested by others. Learn to be aware that whatever others suggest is not needed for your growth of comprehension within perceived inspiration.
The few suggest (want over need); the many consent by either wanting or not wanting the suggested; which puts them into the want versus not want conflict against each other.
This represents division (want vs not want) by suggestion (want over need). What does need represent? Perceived (inspiration) over suggested (information).
Before one can choose a side; one IS the choice based response to perceived balance (need/want). Choosing a suggested side implies want vs not want; while ignoring need for want beforehand.
Because you already consented to be on their side; to use their suggested internet; to want or not want their suggested information.
Agreement versus disagreement (trying to be buddies) does not represents communication; but a "versus" conflict among choices consenting to a suggestion to conflict; versus; reason; want vs not want; imbalance etc. about. Meanwhile; choice represents the response to perceived balance; while being tempted by the suggested choices of others.
The turf that suggestion tempt one into represents imbalance; which is caused by the choice to ignore perceived balance beforehand. The different "turds" ignore the same origin of choice...balance aka momentum within motion for form (life) within flow (inception towards death).
You are tricked by the few who rebrand the want vs not want choice into Russia vs Ukraine; vaxxed vs unvaxxed; right-wing vs left-wing; AMD vs Intel; capitalism vs communism; us vs them; true vs false and so on. Underneath all those suggested labels operates the same want vs not want choice you make upon anything suggested to you. Through this rebranding (revisionism) are the parasitic few selling the narratives to the ignorant many.
PA'RENT, noun (Latin parens, from pario, to produce or bring forth). The foundation for production implies flow (inception towards death) bringing forth form (life). So to raise the seed of ONE (form) within the soil of ALL (flow) requires adaptation to perceived momentum (balance); while resisting suggested choices tempting imbalance.
The child is tempted to want or not want what the parents suggest; while the parents have to sustain self (individual blood and collective bloodline) within momentum by choosing to adapt to need over want. This is where the parents have to question how the child can resist the temptation of falling for suggestions; as to allow him to adapt to what inspires. If you as the parent choose to adapt to inspiration (need) over information (want), then the child is going to mimic and resonate with it.
Try to spot the underlying conflict of reason first...like vs don't like; good vs bad. Once again a rebranding of want vs not want, and only those who suggest what you want or not want, hold the power (your consent) to define; redefine and contradict it at will for you.
Question any notable "winnings" for reason within the suggested his-story of mankind? Then question the use of "agree to disagree" by those who simply seek confirmation for participation in a conflict that cannot be won; since consent to an outside suggestion defines it being fought. Half a century of pro-life (want) vs pro-choice (not want) is what keeps the suggestion of "abortion" going unopposed.
Question reasoning (want vs not want) about suggested food or using the implication (if/then) as inspiration to grow your own food?
Same with the stuff you read from me. Resist the temptation to want vs not want to understand it. Instead ask yourself...how can I grow by using it as implication; instead of feeling overwhelmed trying to figure out what it means?
The way you write represents you adapting to inspiration; while putting it into your own perspective. Keep doing that, but also resist the temptation of all the information suggested by others. Learn to be aware that whatever others suggest is not needed for your growth of comprehension within perceived inspiration.