I was hoping you were quoting a reputable article or something. I haven't been able to find squat published out of there, but I'm just some hillbilly pecker wood from the hills, so nobody cares what I think.
BioWeapon research labs that specialize in weaponisation rarely publish (publicly). Research labs trying to keep appearances of bio-protection do publish.
If you ask questions about the Ukraine BioWeapon labs, you are now being labelled as anti-American Russian supporter (more CIA PsyOp label-attacks).
No mainstream media will touch this subject, until they spin up and alternative and believable narrative about those labs.
Until then, it's deny, slander, censor and avoid.
Because if media and people start digging, they will find links to DoD, State Dept, NIH, NIAID, EcoHealth, WIV, SARS-CoV-2, Swine flu, etc etc etc.
Can't have that.
What's it called when I support each missile that hits a BioLab, but I condemn each tank that crosses the border?
If the labs are for research, then why hasn't there been even ONE paper published from these labs over the past 15-20 years?
Is there proof of that somewhere? I would love to be able to link to that.
If you want proof that something doesn't exist, you need to talk to the agnostics about why that's not practical.
Conversely, anyone on Earth can reveal ONE paper they published and then I'll be proven wrong.
I was hoping you were quoting a reputable article or something. I haven't been able to find squat published out of there, but I'm just some hillbilly pecker wood from the hills, so nobody cares what I think.
BioWeapon research labs that specialize in weaponisation rarely publish (publicly). Research labs trying to keep appearances of bio-protection do publish.