a) ER'ROR, noun [Latin error, from erro, to wander.] implies being form (life) having the choice to wander in response to the balance (momentum) of flow (inception towards death).
Once again you consented to the suggested meaning of others; when using the term "error". You are perpetuating suggested information over perceived inspiration. That represents the foundation of idolatry; but it requires my choice of consent to your suggesting choice to make it work.
b) since one cannot perceive anything created; only everything shaped out of preexisting source, creation implies suggested creationism. Nature doesn't suggest any information; it moves everything within; which causes a momentum (balance) for the responding choices within. Choice itself is therefore shaped out of preexisting balance and to be able to balance it has to be "free" will of choice within the "dom"inance of balance aka free-dom.
c) how could life being moved from inception towards death be "misdirected"? Only ignoring perceived for suggested can corrupt comprehension of direction.
d) HYPOC'RISY, noun [Latin hypocrisis; Greek, simulation; to feign; and, to separate, discern or judge.]...it is collective flow that separates itself into individual form; which allows the communication of inspiration through perceivable differences. If everything would be the same; what would inspire the one within to struggle for self sustenance?
As for simulation...suggestion of information simulates perceived inspiration. Both those who suggest and those who consent to suggested are choosing want over need; thereby ignoring natural law. No karmic alleviation for that...suggestion represents the idolatry of perception. That's a notice of liability.
e) worthy of death ignores that the highest value within ALL existence represents ONEs evaluation thereof aka balance (ALL value) to choice (ONEs evaluation). Your judgement of others represents the suggestion of idolized value (choice); while ignoring perceived value (balance).
by the Creator, whom you're not
Can you create a new thought to show that creation can be perceived? Also; "you are" ignores that I already was before you suggested the label "you are". Furthermore; not; nothing; nothingness represents your ignorance of perceived everything for the suggestion of "nothing" by others. Tell me how can one perceive nothing, when perception implies the response to everything?
Now, focus. Address the OP.
Now implies being within the ever changing moment (um) aka the balance for my responding free will of choice; which I utilize to adapt to whatever inspires me; while resisting the temptation to fall for what others suggest me to choose.
they are "nothing" and "less than nothing", "spittle" ...
That represents your individual choice of evaluation within the same collective balance. The consequences of each choice are collectively shared, and so if you use suggestion of devaluation towards others, you grow the imbalance within the ignored balance everyone shares.
All others represent inspiration (need) and temptation (want) for your choice, and it's on you how to utilize them.
As for nothing...allow yourself to question the origin of "nothing"? Can one perceive nothing or was the concept of nothing suggested by the choice others; while requiring your choice of consent to work? Nothing stands for no-thing...how could one thing (you) within everything perceive no-thing? Having perception implies being the response to perceptible, so how can a without (nothing) exist in a within (everything)?
depending upon their genetics
a) genetics as suggested represents growth; which implies it being a seed within a soil to grow in. Therefore, temporary growth (form) depends on ongoing loss (flow); just like life (form) depends on being moved from inception towards death (flow).
b) genetics as perceived implies "generation"; yet as form within flow; as choice within balance; as temporary within ongoing etc. one represents "regeneration" aka response to being generated. This is why genetics are suggested as geneticism under the umbrella of scientism, hence implying under choice (suggestion) to choice (consent) contract law...the inversion of balance (offer) to choice (response) natural law.
hold whatever ideals they like
That represents the choice to want (like) suggested information (ideals) by others; which are being held as idolized meaning within ones memory (mind). Responding to a memory filled with suggested information represents the ego.
for now, and express them as they see fit.
"now" aka the moment(um) that is forever; "express" aka the temporary form expressing the ongoing flow, and "as they see fit" aka perceiving ALL perceivable through the lens of ONEs comprehension; shaped by free will of choice aka need (by perceived inspiration) or want (by suggested information).
plenty are WITHIN "time"
Exchange the suggested label "time" with the perceived "movement" and it allows comprehension about a) each ONE (form) within ALL (flow) exists within movement, and b) the ONEness (energy) of ALL (flow/form) is moving. Movement doesn't require a label like "time" to communicate itself to those being moved within.
not be relative to them
The relation of those within movement with the movement itself represents the self differentiation of velocity (flow) into resistance (form); which together represent momentum (balance in motion); while individually loss (flow) and growth (form) aka the internal power; balance; self sustenance of energy (the ONEness of ALL aka the generator for all regeneration within).
As for explaining this...comprehension represents the ONE seed within the soil of ALL perceived, and keeping comprehension/perception in resonance with balance requires the constant struggle of choice to adapt to perceived inspiration (need); while resisting suggested information (want). Falling for the latter causes the imbalance (want vs not want) within the ignored balance (need/want).
a) ER'ROR, noun [Latin error, from erro, to wander.] implies being form (life) having the choice to wander in response to the balance (momentum) of flow (inception towards death).
Once again you consented to the suggested meaning of others; when using the term "error". You are perpetuating suggested information over perceived inspiration. That represents the foundation of idolatry; but it requires my choice of consent to your suggesting choice to make it work.
b) since one cannot perceive anything created; only everything shaped out of preexisting source, creation implies suggested creationism. Nature doesn't suggest any information; it moves everything within; which causes a momentum (balance) for the responding choices within. Choice itself is therefore shaped out of preexisting balance and to be able to balance it has to be "free" will of choice within the "dom"inance of balance aka free-dom.
c) how could life being moved from inception towards death be "misdirected"? Only ignoring perceived for suggested can corrupt comprehension of direction.
d) HYPOC'RISY, noun [Latin hypocrisis; Greek, simulation; to feign; and, to separate, discern or judge.]...it is collective flow that separates itself into individual form; which allows the communication of inspiration through perceivable differences. If everything would be the same; what would inspire the one within to struggle for self sustenance?
As for simulation...suggestion of information simulates perceived inspiration. Both those who suggest and those who consent to suggested are choosing want over need; thereby ignoring natural law. No karmic alleviation for that...suggestion represents the idolatry of perception. That's a notice of liability.
e) worthy of death ignores that the highest value within ALL existence represents ONEs evaluation thereof aka balance (ALL value) to choice (ONEs evaluation). Your judgement of others represents the suggestion of idolized value (choice); while ignoring perceived value (balance).
Can you create a new thought to show that creation can be perceived? Also; "you are" ignores that I already was before you suggested the label "you are". Furthermore; not; nothing; nothingness represents your ignorance of perceived everything for the suggestion of "nothing" by others. Tell me how can one perceive nothing, when perception implies the response to everything?
Now implies being within the ever changing moment (um) aka the balance for my responding free will of choice; which I utilize to adapt to whatever inspires me; while resisting the temptation to fall for what others suggest me to choose.
How could I be within the ongoing movement called "time" without expressing it?
That represents your individual choice of evaluation within the same collective balance. The consequences of each choice are collectively shared, and so if you use suggestion of devaluation towards others, you grow the imbalance within the ignored balance everyone shares.
All others represent inspiration (need) and temptation (want) for your choice, and it's on you how to utilize them.
As for nothing...allow yourself to question the origin of "nothing"? Can one perceive nothing or was the concept of nothing suggested by the choice others; while requiring your choice of consent to work? Nothing stands for no-thing...how could one thing (you) within everything perceive no-thing? Having perception implies being the response to perceptible, so how can a without (nothing) exist in a within (everything)?
a) genetics as suggested represents growth; which implies it being a seed within a soil to grow in. Therefore, temporary growth (form) depends on ongoing loss (flow); just like life (form) depends on being moved from inception towards death (flow).
b) genetics as perceived implies "generation"; yet as form within flow; as choice within balance; as temporary within ongoing etc. one represents "regeneration" aka response to being generated. This is why genetics are suggested as geneticism under the umbrella of scientism, hence implying under choice (suggestion) to choice (consent) contract law...the inversion of balance (offer) to choice (response) natural law.
That represents the choice to want (like) suggested information (ideals) by others; which are being held as idolized meaning within ones memory (mind). Responding to a memory filled with suggested information represents the ego.
"now" aka the moment(um) that is forever; "express" aka the temporary form expressing the ongoing flow, and "as they see fit" aka perceiving ALL perceivable through the lens of ONEs comprehension; shaped by free will of choice aka need (by perceived inspiration) or want (by suggested information).
Exchange the suggested label "time" with the perceived "movement" and it allows comprehension about a) each ONE (form) within ALL (flow) exists within movement, and b) the ONEness (energy) of ALL (flow/form) is moving. Movement doesn't require a label like "time" to communicate itself to those being moved within.
The relation of those within movement with the movement itself represents the self differentiation of velocity (flow) into resistance (form); which together represent momentum (balance in motion); while individually loss (flow) and growth (form) aka the internal power; balance; self sustenance of energy (the ONEness of ALL aka the generator for all regeneration within).
As for explaining this...comprehension represents the ONE seed within the soil of ALL perceived, and keeping comprehension/perception in resonance with balance requires the constant struggle of choice to adapt to perceived inspiration (need); while resisting suggested information (want). Falling for the latter causes the imbalance (want vs not want) within the ignored balance (need/want).