I noticed a lot of posts on the (((Oliver Stone))) Ukraine on Fire Documentary. Before you watch it keep in mind Oliver's background in addition to his standing in the NWO.
Watch how Stone cowered away from Epstein questions on the Joe Rogan Podcast. It's incredible that a man so closely tied to conspiracies would have no interest in Epstein...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7GcZeUoL3tM
My argument, or word of caution, is that just because something is banned by youtube doesn't mean it isn't still information from a controlled NWO view.
+1
He's no ken burns. He's more like the anti-ken burns. Where ken burns tries to document and often bores as a result, stone seeks to convince and entertain.
That said, his people's history was great and well worth watching.
Ukraine on fire is a weird one / outlier. He is certainly pushing the "US is responsible" angle, but doesn't come out and say it himself. The take away I got from a single viewing was that ukraine is a really f*ed up / fractured place and has been for a while. He didn't "document" any of the organized crime, "russian bride" syndicate, us biolabs, or jewish israeli organ harvesting - for a few examples. What he intentionally left out is certainly meaningful, and perhaps more meaningful than what he left in.