I can't help but think that if this happens the MiG fighter jets will NEVER leave the custody of the US military. They could easily be repainted or whatever to be identified as actual Russian fighters.
I smell a False Flag in which the US, disguises the MiGs to look Russian and then attacks the Ukrainian people. NATO/US uses this "atrocity" to justify entry into the conflict. Escalate. Escalate. Escalate. WW3.
Are you bananas? That's not how they're identified. Chessy WW2 plot.
The concern was how to pull a no fly zone by being Polish. Send the Americans in. Yanke doodle doo. You won't shoot at me we're on delivery. Banana. Next there's a sky full of Nato. No Poland. Are you gonna start it?
Poland was upgrading them anyway for F35s. It made sense.
Poland just want to use MIGs for discount on F35s they forced to buy by NATO.
If you think that NATO is some defence alliance of countries - you have been lied. NATO is a weaponry shop for MIC. That is why they are so obsessed with expansion. To get new markets. Every time new country join NATO it forced to buy "NATO standard weapons", despite it could have their own perfetly working ones. I saw it in Hungary, Poland and other Western European countries. Poland bought absolutely unneeded 250 Abramses some time ago and in the same way tried to sell or exchange their T72s. Hungarians told me that NATO bring nothing except continous spending taxpayers money on "NATO standard" weapons. There are no any difference what guns to use for defence - AK or M16. That tales about different ammo is bullshit, it is not a problem to produce any ammo on the same facilities. But if you join NATO you have to throw out even all your AKs and buy M16s or whatever. It's all about trade, not defence. Even when Russia have negotiations about joining NATO everything was ruined by strict demand to purchase "NATO standard weapons" . Unbelievable, but yes, at some point there was an idea to completely exterminate all that NATO/Russia political bullshit by joining Russia to NATO. Putin even opened a real NATO base with US staff under Ulianovsk to service NATO planes on their way to Afganistan. and back. Yes, NATO had a military base even in Russia. But everything appeared to be about money and US MIC sales, not about some fictional defence, peace and protection.
That is the real reason NATO have to permanently expand and that is why every new country tries to sell or somehow exchange old non-NATO weapons to lower their losses on forced purchases of "NATO standard weapons". Just a business, nothing more.
I can't help but think that if this happens the MiG fighter jets will NEVER leave the custody of the US military. They could easily be repainted or whatever to be identified as actual Russian fighters.
I smell a False Flag in which the US, disguises the MiGs to look Russian and then attacks the Ukrainian people. NATO/US uses this "atrocity" to justify entry into the conflict. Escalate. Escalate. Escalate. WW3.
Another odd story that includes the work of Nuland
Are you bananas? That's not how they're identified. Chessy WW2 plot.
The concern was how to pull a no fly zone by being Polish. Send the Americans in. Yanke doodle doo. You won't shoot at me we're on delivery. Banana. Next there's a sky full of Nato. No Poland. Are you gonna start it?
Poland was upgrading them anyway for F35s. It made sense.
Poland just want to use MIGs for discount on F35s they forced to buy by NATO.
If you think that NATO is some defence alliance of countries - you have been lied. NATO is a weaponry shop for MIC. That is why they are so obsessed with expansion. To get new markets. Every time new country join NATO it forced to buy "NATO standard weapons", despite it could have their own perfetly working ones. I saw it in Hungary, Poland and other Western European countries. Poland bought absolutely unneeded 250 Abramses some time ago and in the same way tried to sell or exchange their T72s. Hungarians told me that NATO bring nothing except continous spending taxpayers money on "NATO standard" weapons. There are no any difference what guns to use for defence - AK or M16. That tales about different ammo is bullshit, it is not a problem to produce any ammo on the same facilities. But if you join NATO you have to throw out even all your AKs and buy M16s or whatever. It's all about trade, not defence. Even when Russia have negotiations about joining NATO everything was ruined by strict demand to purchase "NATO standard weapons" . Unbelievable, but yes, at some point there was an idea to completely exterminate all that NATO/Russia political bullshit by joining Russia to NATO. Putin even opened a real NATO base with US staff under Ulianovsk to service NATO planes on their way to Afganistan. and back. Yes, NATO had a military base even in Russia. But everything appeared to be about money and US MIC sales, not about some fictional defence, peace and protection.
That is the real reason NATO have to permanently expand and that is why every new country tries to sell or somehow exchange old non-NATO weapons to lower their losses on forced purchases of "NATO standard weapons". Just a business, nothing more.
i heard the ghost of kiev is going to fly ALL of them TO ukraine himself!!!!
I think they want to use Russian aircraft in false flag strikes against Ukranian civilians so they can further demonize Russia.