For those that don’t know use duck duck go and search for it but it was an interview done on a forum in 2008 and the person explaining things said why our world is the way it is and he explained the meaning of life. He answered the biggest and deepest questions we all have. I read it and I want to believe it but I still want to hear what other ppl think about it so for those that have read it? Do u believe what was explained or do u have any doubts ??
Comments (25)
sorted by:
That post always fascinated me, even if it's fake whoever wrote seriously did some research and knows a lot
for example what? curious because I took a fast look at that forum post/article/interview and didn't notice anything interesting.
I should clarify I meaqnt in the esoteric wisdom. Whether that kind of esoterism has any merit or not idk but he he has knowledge of those studies.
The HH was very well read in esoteria. I'm not concerned about the identity or truthfulness of who HH is because "trusted source" is a logical fallacy in action.
It doesn't really matter if you believe these things are true, what is important is understanding that there are powerful people who do believe the things HH talks about.
If the HH post helps you understand the world, then it is 100% true. If it doesn't resonate with you, it is useless larp.
Don't look anywhere outside of yourself for the meaning of life. Everything comes from within. The kingdom of heaven is within you.
FWIW: I've recommended many people read the HH post since 2008. It really ties the room together in the house of Conspiracies. At the very least, I think everyone should read it because it can act as sort of a Rosetta stone for conspiracy 'communities'
Perceiving the consequences of action implies being the reaction within action aka the form (life) within the momentum (balance) of flow (inception towards death). If one exists within the balance of motion; then logic aka reason aka the conflict between wanting vs not wanting suggested information aka imbalance represents the ignorance of balance (perceived) for imbalance (suggested).
So both trusted source and logic within action represent fallacies.
To believe implies consent to the suggested information by others. Does will submitting to will of others sound powerful or more like a denigration of power? What if choice (suggestion) to choice (consent) contract law can be used to deceive those consenting to ignore balance (offer) to choice (response) natural law? Sounds like a simple control mechanism to allow the few power over the many...
Question the difference between understanding (standing under) suggested information, and comprehending (compression within self) perceived inspiration? Does the center of balance (choice) really need to stand under suggested information or adapt to being moved; while growing comprehension of perceived for more efficient resistance to velocity?
a) self sustenance
b) meaning is predefined by flow (inception towards death) for the form (life) within. ONE can only comprehend ALL predefined meaning; not define; redefine or contradict perceived inspiration....unless as suggested information towards others tempted enough to fall for it.
Energy (internal power) aka internal balance of velocity (loss) and resistance (growth) with ONEs choice as the responding center of ALL perceivable balance aka the seed of ONE (temporary growth) within the soil of ALL (ongoing loss).
In other words...ALL self segregates internally to allow each ONE within to express growth (life) within loss (inception towards death).
The 2008 "Hidden Hand" suggests information to those consenting to it; the 2011 "I Am A ROFSCHILD, Axe Me A Question" adapts to perceived inspiration. The former tempts to understand (stand under) suggested information; the latter requires to grow comprehension by adaptation to perceived inspiration.
In short...the hidden hand interview uses suggestion to trick readers into consenting to a conflict of reason (want vs not want aka believing vs doubting). A divide (reason) and conquer (consent to suggestion) tool.
RID'DLE, noun [to separate]...being the perceiving ONE within the perceivable ALL already implies the internal separation (self segregation) of ALL into ONEs. The parasitic few suggest riddles to deceive the ignorant many to want suggested solutions for them.
Furthermore; as form (life) within flow (inception towards death); it's form that represents the resisting matter within the solution of flow. The struggle to sustain self (extending life); while resisting the temptation of the ongoing solution (back to base) represents the extended riddle.
are you made up of AI trying to sound wise and human?
Wise; from Saxon (wis) to German (weise; wissen) - "to know" aka to perceive. Before the suggested word (wise) comes the perceived sound, and your use of suggestion tempts others to ignore perception for it. That's the main trick being played about the ignorant many by the suggesting few.
Example...the few suggest "insane person" to deceive the many to ignore "in sanus" (within sound) + "per sonos" (by sound) aka being within; by and in response to the perceivable source of sound. Suggested words do not represents meaning, but idolized meaning (information) for perceived meaning (inspiration). This represents spell-craft.
The words HU'MAN from Hebrew (form) and ANIMAL (animated) represent suggested allegory for being form (life) within flow (inception towards death).
a) artificial (suggested information) implies the ignorance of natural (perceived inspiration).
b) the parasitic few suggest that intelligence (from intelligo) means understanding (aka standing under suggested information); which represents the inversion of comprehension aka ALL (flow) perceived inspiration "compressed" within each ONE (form) adapting to it.
Comprehension cannot be shared; it needs to be grown by adaptation to perceived inspiration (natural law); while understanding can be shared by suggestion (contract law) aka choice (suggestion) to choice (consent) contract law in ignorance of balance (offer) to choice (response) natural law.
tl;dr...nope; but you wield the free will of choice to believe whatever you want; which in return shapes your perception through the lens of self inflicted beliefs.
They view things on the collective consciousness level, not the individual level. So to them, if "everyone knows" they're hurting kids, and we don't stop it that we are allowing this to happen.
The Hidden Hand reference was used, and perhaps coined, by Adam Smith in his The Wealth of Nations as an invisible governing force that acts upon markets
Lucifer aka light bearer aka enlightenment aka growth of comprehension by adaptation to perceived.
Believing aka consent to suggested information aka ignoring (source of dark) perceived inspiration (source of light). The "ALL seeing I" represents ONEs comprehension of ALL perceived (inspiration); not ignoring it for the suggestions (information) by other ONEs aka the "chosen ones" aka the parasitic few; that the ignorant many shirk response-ability of choice onto; when consenting to suggestions.
Calling others the "elite" (selection; choice) implies ignoring to be free will of choice, hence bound to choice (suggestion) to choice (consent) contract law; while ignoring balance (offer) to choice (response) natural law.
If each ONE of the many ignores to utilize choice in response to perceived ALL; then the few who suggest, become the "chosen ones".
Human (hebrew; form) implies being the temporary formed resistance (life) withing ongoing flowing velocity (inception towards death). The parasitic few are not "against" other form; they ruthlessly exploit the many who ignore resisting velocity. The ignorance of the many a) represents the host weakness that attracts the parasitic exploitation thereof and b) tempts the insolence of the few.
It's the majority of humanity that chooses to ignore self sustenance (choice based adaptation to balance); which in return puts them into self destructive imbalance (choice vs choice).
Sacrifice aka "sacred (that keeps apart) + facio (to make). It's flow (inception towards death) that makes and keeps form (life) apart within itself. What the parasitic few are doing is suggesting the ignorant many to transmute back to base aka flow to form (inception); form within flow (life), and form to flow (death). They utilize contract law (choice suggesting towards choice consenting) to alchemically transmute the ingredient (form) back to base (flow).
We can call this a death cult all we want; but the issue is with the many who ignore the who; where; what and why of being alive. The few simply represent the (very annoying) parasitic response to ignorance; which eventually will teach the many about response-ability of choice as the center of balance. Until then it's self destruction galore; spearheaded by suggestions of insufferable cunts.
The way (flow) defines the existence of those (form) within. Flow represents justice (that which just is) for the responding form within. One doesn't need to justify anything suggested; one needs to reply to everything perceived.
Chance represents the suggested inversion of choice; chance suggests "the effect of an unknown cause"; while choice implies the response to the perceived (knowledge) source of balance.
ONE within ALL aka choice within balance aka flow within form represents "odds within even". We are being tricked to ignore perceived even (needed inspiration) for suggested odds (wanted information).
"never had a chance" represents the suggested inversion for "always being choice".
Are you shilling or just stupid?
"I am a generational member of a Ruling Bloodline Family."
TLDR: Prove it, or else STFU glowie. This could have been written by anyone. Next.
Have u read the interview? It’s really convincing
Even if you personally heard this from the entire Rothschild family, you couldn't take the information for granted. People shouting "trust the science" relied on sources instead of information and logic.
Information stands on it's own. There is no such thing as a trusted source. Honest people can lie, or be mistaken; liars can also tell the truth.
Truth by itself doesn't actually imply anything. Just because something is true doesn't mean that it is useful to you. The statement "people are dying" is 100% true, but without context it's meaningless.
Sometimes things are factually incorrect, but metaphorically true. This metaphorical truth could be useful to some, and not to others.
Yes, there is. That is a retarded statement. So many obvious holes in this like "13 blood lines" - OK what are the names?
This sounds like a glowie faggot. 100% airy-fairy bullshit scam hoax. Anyone who thinks this is not some wanna-be wanker is a moronic 1/2 wit. This just sounds like some weirdo who eats granola and did too much acid. Probably reads Tarot cards. Next.
A person or institution of authority could be wrong; therefore the authority that such a person or institution holds does not have any intrinsic bearing upon whether their claims are true or not.
If you can't look up the "13 bloodlines" on your own...
Not into faggy glowie bullshit, no thanks. As I said, any doofus could have written this story. You have no reason to believe only a reason to WANT to believe. Probably to satisfy your own biases.
I wasn't convinced by the New Age stuff. It felt a bit too like it was trying to persuade despite efforts elsewhere to appear aloof.