Nato is back to spending. It means that Europe is sooner doing deals away from the Union. It has rallied and starts to allign back to its military treaty and those commanding it. Profiting others making direct deals. How do the redlines openly crossed suddenly close. Perhaps causing better policy on security of the Internet, and media. Price of oil/gas rising sooner causes renewable investments. Supply lines get rearranged on a host of production. What about any others. How does it ripple affecting them. Do they get pushed back, or are sanctions worked around. What about the economy. What about races and competing solutions?
How far does that rabbithole go. I'd probably stay out of it. But fuck you Alice.
They do have a small point. But absurdly they're not considering it, past any propaganda. I agree there are a lot of fake streams and reports. But studios have done this from warzones and conflict regions for longer today. It has gotten so much easier to broadcast from a studio then actually being on the ground. In doing so they can recreate an evironment cheaper and risk free rather than being there. Instead of previously making entire movies off of war footage.
It's simply a narrative they're stuck on, yes it's a conspiracy. But not to the extent of a fake war.
This is real and the stakes are much higher. But all wars have opportunity and agendas.
It just didn't fit into the narrative that's been playing by some people already. I don't have to repeat it. It's out there already by using the title fake war and you're gonna come across it. They're stuck on the propaganda instead how and what it affects and why.
But regardless war like fire can spread and it reacts. There isn't set policy for it. It can cause confrontation igniting.
Although where has been formulated. It's not random. Begging why. No it's not propaganda when it causes policy.
Fake? It's not fake. But it creates opportunity.
Nato is back to spending. It means that Europe is sooner doing deals away from the Union. It has rallied and starts to allign back to its military treaty and those commanding it. Profiting others making direct deals. How do the redlines openly crossed suddenly close. Perhaps causing better policy on security of the Internet, and media. Price of oil/gas rising sooner causes renewable investments. Supply lines get rearranged on a host of production. What about any others. How does it ripple affecting them. Do they get pushed back, or are sanctions worked around. What about the economy. What about races and competing solutions?
How far does that rabbithole go. I'd probably stay out of it. But fuck you Alice.
Don't waste your breath. These deniers are a special breed of stupid.
They do have a small point. But absurdly they're not considering it, past any propaganda. I agree there are a lot of fake streams and reports. But studios have done this from warzones and conflict regions for longer today. It has gotten so much easier to broadcast from a studio then actually being on the ground. In doing so they can recreate an evironment cheaper and risk free rather than being there. Instead of previously making entire movies off of war footage.
It's simply a narrative they're stuck on, yes it's a conspiracy. But not to the extent of a fake war.
Thanks.
it's a fake war as in all wars are scripted banker wars
SHEKEL FIGHT!!!
This is real and the stakes are much higher. But all wars have opportunity and agendas.
It just didn't fit into the narrative that's been playing by some people already. I don't have to repeat it. It's out there already by using the title fake war and you're gonna come across it. They're stuck on the propaganda instead how and what it affects and why.
But regardless war like fire can spread and it reacts. There isn't set policy for it. It can cause confrontation igniting.
Although where has been formulated. It's not random. Begging why. No it's not propaganda when it causes policy.