The British "royal" family is jewish!
(birthofanewearthblog.com)
Comments (13)
sorted by:
This is the jewish mohel who did the circumcision for the "royals": https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jacob_Snowman
http://whale.to/c/zionism_britain.html
More info in this page (click up for the rest of the pages): https://www.originofnations.org/Royals/british_royalty_and_israelitish.htm
The British royals and the Rothschilds are the visible head of the snake; a council of Rabbis (The sanhderin) is the real head.
Yawn it's a tired argument. Doesn't it connect to Islam as well if you want to try and spin it as religious? Almost every monarchy's ancient bloodlines go how far back and are faster interconnected to many other monarchy's existing today. It would be akin to stating we all came from Adam and Eve. Okay perhaps there are more immediate ties to supposed other leading House's. But claiming them as being religious, outside of their practices, is a tedious concept.
If I understood you correctly, your point is that even if they are jewish, it does not matter?
I beg to differ. The thing with judaism, is that it's different from all other religions. In specific, in the belief that the jewish soul is inherently superior to all non-jewish souls. You can look up my Talmud posts on the subject.
This would explain why Epstein and Maxwell could stay at the queen's cabin.
She looks like an Ashkenazi. And she's had a nose job. You can tell if you look closely.
Oh, and how Rothschild could poke Charles in the chest and he would just take it.
Not saying I am convinced about the whole concept as presented in the post above, just mentioning a few things that we might consider.
I believe this royal/banker/jewish rabbinical connections is the end of the rabbit hole. This is why it is difficult to find widespread resources on it.
We have two facts:
1-All the manipulation and world control in the last 200 years came from the British crown: http://tarpley.net/online-books/against-oligarchy/
2-jewish influence is undeniably and demonstrably too great to be ignored.
If British royalty is actually European, and if they have had the influence proven by Tarpley's work, you would expect them to do better for their own race instead of completely destroying it! Even if they are greedy/power hungry etc.. Something just doesn't add up.
It all becomes clear when you consider that the Royal family is nothing but jewish and have long been interconnected with jewish power (The visible facade of the bankers and rabbis, in the same fashion of how jewish Venetian black nobility operated).
I said it links to Islam as well. Your argument of are they Jewish is irrelevant when they are also potentially Islamic as well. But practice Christianity through The Church of England. Today it practices free religion. Hence it has become another relic. Death and marriage for ceremony not because the majority of the population go to church on someday.
Do they practice Judaism, not unless you consider all masonic beliefs to be. Have parts of the royal family married other notable House's possibly associated with Judaism. Perhaps. It doesn't mean much else. Are royal bloodlines ascendant, of course.
Freemasonry is the goyim version of the Kabbalah, if you have done some research you would actually know that. And in case you didn't know, Kabbalah is esoteric judaism.
At this time in history muzzies are a non threat. Muzzie migrants are orchestrated by jewish forces and "Islamic" rulers are also puppets of the jewish "British royal" family.
That's some spin. Where if we play that history Jews came out of Babylon and the Talmud is Summerian.
https://www.chabad.org/library/article_cdo/aid/2652565/jewish/The-Babylonian-Talmud.htm
https://ldsseminary.wordpress.com/2017/09/23/the-moses-birth-story-and-the-sargon-birth-narrative/
Somehow you must have thought pyramid building was exclusive to Judaism? Because Masons haven't know it.
I understand you wanted to claim royal bloodlines as belonging to religion? Instead of founding religion. It's no wonder why we've sooner got dinosaurs and neanderthals as an origin.
Best scholoraly info on the manipulations done by the "royals": http://tarpley.net/online-books/against-oligarchy/
Perhaps you can be more specific in your critique of the validity of my proposition?
The word semitic is meaningless jargon, hebrew is derived from ancient Arabic/Aramaic/Assyrian. At the very least it lumps Arabs and the Palestinians who are oppressed and being genocided by the jewish illegal immigrant hordes.
I have only stated facts, if it is fan fiction as you say and "too stupid", perhaps you can easily denote which part is, instead of a childish ad hominem.