But I don't think we were created by mixing chimp with pig, so it wouldn't be a backcross.
Maybe his theory is designed to make us think human-pig hybrids aren't really all that bad -- so when we see one, we don't kill it immediately as well as the people who created it.
If that is the case, then may the author burn in hell.
yeah some of them are wild, I think the basis of his research is that evolution is bunk and human were the result of archaic primates all breeding with each other and sharing genes ect. the crazy hybrid stuff would more of natural accidents.
Oh, yeah, the pig guy.
Not buying it.
BUT I think a lot of others DO buy it and are attempting human-pig "backcrosses."
See "art" here: https://www.weekendnotes.com/im/002/07/the-young-family-patricia-piccinini-bendigo-art-ga1.JPG
But I don't think we were created by mixing chimp with pig, so it wouldn't be a backcross.
Maybe his theory is designed to make us think human-pig hybrids aren't really all that bad -- so when we see one, we don't kill it immediately as well as the people who created it.
If that is the case, then may the author burn in hell.
yeah some of them are wild, I think the basis of his research is that evolution is bunk and human were the result of archaic primates all breeding with each other and sharing genes ect. the crazy hybrid stuff would more of natural accidents.
Human "evolution" originates off wolrd
https://youtu.be/nsI60KcuiUA
You may be interested in Robert Sepehr's work on hybrids in anthropology.
oh man i love his work. "worlds most dangerous anthropologist" lol
Is this called "The last tango in Paris" theory?
Well these geniuses believed in “waste DNA” and that humans and neanderthals couldn’t interbreed...