I think they vastly over estimate their capabilities. The globalist system is a network based on nodes of power. The problem is there are large parts of the earth that are almost impossible to govern. Why do you think the elites are so desperate to herd the population into these "smart cities"? For example in the United States most of the "nodes" of the globalist system are located in about a dozen or so cities only a handful of which are located in the interior along a few critical transport axes. With a mass casualty event I honestly wonder if they would even bother trying to "govern" the hinter land of North America and wouldn't just consolidate their power in the coastal regions they controlled.
In fact if you look at what the globalists have done since the 1990's with abandoning their American power bases in favour of China I have to wonder if the globalists strategic agenda hasn't pivoted away from the Atlantic and North America as it has been since the 16th century with the European empires and now the American empire and is now pivoting towards the Eurasia-Pacific region. Would the globalists really try to bother controlling Montana or Wyoming or Maine and Newfoundland in Canada? Sparely populated. Poor. No strategic importance.
If you look at America for example - in the post cold war era power in America really rested in the narrow corridor between Boston (MIT), New York (finance) and Washington D.C (admin/military industrial) where as now I would say the most powerful faction are the big tech firms in California. They control something even more important than money or force of arms. Big tech control what the normie masses think and how they perceive the world - more so than even the mainstream media ever did.
They have more than enough with the coastal regions and transport corridors for their logistical systems.
no they want all the resources and all the land to build their techno-future, they're not going to 'live and let live'
You will own nothing and you will be happy.
I think they vastly over estimate their capabilities. The globalist system is a network based on nodes of power. The problem is there are large parts of the earth that are almost impossible to govern. Why do you think the elites are so desperate to herd the population into these "smart cities"? For example in the United States most of the "nodes" of the globalist system are located in about a dozen or so cities only a handful of which are located in the interior along a few critical transport axes. With a mass casualty event I honestly wonder if they would even bother trying to "govern" the hinter land of North America and wouldn't just consolidate their power in the coastal regions they controlled.
In fact if you look at what the globalists have done since the 1990's with abandoning their American power bases in favour of China I have to wonder if the globalists strategic agenda hasn't pivoted away from the Atlantic and North America as it has been since the 16th century with the European empires and now the American empire and is now pivoting towards the Eurasia-Pacific region. Would the globalists really try to bother controlling Montana or Wyoming or Maine and Newfoundland in Canada? Sparely populated. Poor. No strategic importance.
If you look at America for example - in the post cold war era power in America really rested in the narrow corridor between Boston (MIT), New York (finance) and Washington D.C (admin/military industrial) where as now I would say the most powerful faction are the big tech firms in California. They control something even more important than money or force of arms. Big tech control what the normie masses think and how they perceive the world - more so than even the mainstream media ever did.
They have more than enough with the coastal regions and transport corridors for their logistical systems.