But on national court rulings. Could it block the platform off of the national internet. Or stop the means of payment, such as Canadian banks receiving payments off the platform. The court ruled to halt funds, it states no jurisdiction. Court decision isn't ruling on the platform. It's decision is to block those funds.
Hard to do, and quickly raises huge questions, but it isn't impossible and there are work arounds. Ultimately it forces a bigger response.
Example when online money gambling was banned in the USA. Freeplay wasn't. Yes the website also complied in some reason preventing lawsuits. But when it's a website transacting into Canada that those funds have been ruled forfeit. Any transaction potentially going into Canada is faster?
How did they turn off Twitter in those foreign countries recently?
There are workarounds, you listed something, but it often means shell accounts under different proxys.
At least the platform is defying. That is a win.
But on national court rulings. Could it block the platform off of the national internet. Or stop the means of payment, such as Canadian banks receiving payments off the platform. The court ruled to halt funds, it states no jurisdiction. Court decision isn't ruling on the platform. It's decision is to block those funds.
Hard to do, and quickly raises huge questions, but it isn't impossible and there are work arounds. Ultimately it forces a bigger response.
Prepaid credit cards baby!
Yes. You're not understanding that power.
Example when online money gambling was banned in the USA. Freeplay wasn't. Yes the website also complied in some reason preventing lawsuits. But when it's a website transacting into Canada that those funds have been ruled forfeit. Any transaction potentially going into Canada is faster?
How did they turn off Twitter in those foreign countries recently?
There are workarounds, you listed something, but it often means shell accounts under different proxys.