I think it's important to look at that in a lot of things. what if a person who upholds science receives blood or plasma from someone who doesn't understand science? To be clear I'm purposefully reversing the "trust the science" narrative because it is a blatant propaganda term and is inherently nonsensical because science is accomplished through questioning, not trusting. The true believers in science are often also refusers of mandatory experimental gene therapy.
Anyway, are they forcing people to get a shot before they get an organ transplant because a infected transplant in an otherwise healthy person would be too easy to detect and show as bad? they are desperate to muddy the waters of science by removing any control group and thus any ability to say all this new disease and death is due to the vaccine and not the wuhan bioweapon.
From what I understand, maybe. Depending on the level of exposure. Ivermectin could block the infection, plus condoms, etc. Science has been taken over by genocidal communists, so don't expect a real answer anytime soon.
If there is blood to blood contact, its possible.
Getting HIV from even gay sex is pretty rare, something like 1.9 percent. Goes to show you how much degenerate crap the faggots do. Getting HIV from normal sex is basically a non-risk. Goes to show you how much degenerate crap liberals do.
Wonder if you have sex with a jabbed person will you get their aids
I think it's important to look at that in a lot of things. what if a person who upholds science receives blood or plasma from someone who doesn't understand science? To be clear I'm purposefully reversing the "trust the science" narrative because it is a blatant propaganda term and is inherently nonsensical because science is accomplished through questioning, not trusting. The true believers in science are often also refusers of mandatory experimental gene therapy. Anyway, are they forcing people to get a shot before they get an organ transplant because a infected transplant in an otherwise healthy person would be too easy to detect and show as bad? they are desperate to muddy the waters of science by removing any control group and thus any ability to say all this new disease and death is due to the vaccine and not the wuhan bioweapon.
From what I understand, maybe. Depending on the level of exposure. Ivermectin could block the infection, plus condoms, etc. Science has been taken over by genocidal communists, so don't expect a real answer anytime soon.
If there is blood to blood contact, its possible. Getting HIV from even gay sex is pretty rare, something like 1.9 percent. Goes to show you how much degenerate crap the faggots do. Getting HIV from normal sex is basically a non-risk. Goes to show you how much degenerate crap liberals do.