The reason the disease is so confusing is because it is less a virus than it is engineered spike proteins hitch-hiking a ride on a SARSr-CoV quasispecies swarm. The closer it is to the final live attenuated vaccine form, the more likely that it has been deattenuating since initial escape in August 2019.
The gene-encoded, or “mRNA,” vaccines work poorly because they are synthetic replications of the already-synthetic SARSr-CoV-WIV synthetic spike proteins and possess no other epitopes. The mRNA instructs the cells to produce synthetic copies of the SARSr-CoV-WIV synthetic spike protein directly into the bloodstream, wherein they spread and produce the same ACE2 immune storm that the recombinant vaccine does. Many doctors in the country have identified that the symptoms of vaccine reactions mirror the symptoms of the disease, which corroborates with the similar synthetic nature and function of the respective spike proteins.
The vaccine recipient has no defense against the bloodstream entry, but their nose protects them from the recombinant spike protein quasispecies during “natural infection” (better termed as aerosolized inoculation).
Ivermectin (identified as curative in April 2020) works throughout all phases of illness because it both inhibits viral replication and modulates the immune response. Of note, chloroquine phosphate (Hydroxychloroquine, identified April 2020 as curative) is identified in the (2018 EchoHealth Funding application to DARPA) proposal as a SARSr-CoV inhibitor, as is interferon (identified May 2020 as curative).
A technological challenge as difficult as inoculating bats in China would be tried at DARPA first. The massive, “Manhattan Project”-level of information suppression executed by the government and the Trusted News Initiative indicates that it would be covered-up if something bad happened. The lab-leak hypothesis and squabbling between Senator Paul and Dr. Fauci indicated that the cover up was more localized. Further, an actual cover-up would be more disciplined with its paperwork. So, I presumed that unclassified files would be concealed on a higher network and found them where I expected them to be. I understood what they were and their content, pushed the files off-site, and compiled this report.
the documents, an August 2021 report to the Inspector General of the Department of Defense: “SARS-CoV-2 matches the SARS vaccine variants the NIH-EcoHealth program was making in Wuhan.”
Major Murphy states clearly that in 2018 HCQ was indentified by Ecohealth as an effective coronavirus treatment in its DARPA funding application which was turned down by DARPA for the gain of function risks.
He also says that by early 2020 DARPA had identified HCQ, Ivermectin as effective against all stages of Covid. DARPA identified other drugs around the same time
See DARPA research on Amodaquine in link below in early 2020
The same goes for the coronavirus bat vaccine to be developed at Wuhan set out in the EchoHealth DARPA 2018 funding application which also involved paying 1/2 of Prof Shi's (the WIV bat lady) salary plus Prof Baric at Chapel Hill.
NIH EchoHealth funding has not been properly disclosed or if the bat vaccine was developed as originally set out and if so what happened to the bat vaccine
Major Murphy states he had access to classified reports
He also explains why the vaccines do not work. No one has set out why this is not correct - this may be more subjective but he then goes on to state that the data he has seen leads him and those who have advised him to believe the vaccines are toxic and dangerous as they create the same effects as the virus and go on producing these spikes around the whole body.
Go and read all the links posted with the source post - its too time consuming to keep posting the same data
Parts of the Federal Govt are withholding vital information including that DARPA had shown in early 2020 that ivermectin and HCQ were effective against all stages of Covid
Major Murphy states HCQ and ivermectin were identified in early 2020 as effective against all stages of Covid by DARPA along with other drugs and that EchoHealth stated in 2018 HCQ was effective against coronaviruses in its funding application.
This EchoHealth data would have been available to NIH and Dr Fauci EchoHealth's final Wuhan funder
Also see separate verification of the same for Amodaquine in public research done for DARPA at the same time in early 2020 Major Murphy says this was happening for a range of drugs
and that EchoHealth stated in 2018 HCQ was effective against coronaviruses in its funding
This EchoHealth data would have been available to NIH and Dr Fauci EchoHealth's final Wuhan funder
I agree with you that hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin are helpful, but ecohealth alone isn’t sufficient weight to pull the entire government to this conclusion. It’s proof of a dissent in opinions, but not proof of much beyond that. Ecohealth alliance is not the arbiter of truth for DARPA or the us government, nor would we want them to be fully. It’s the same problem as the Wuhan Lab doing covid fact checking. It’s a unreliable source with a vested interest. It’s important information and it’s indicative of more investigation but it itself isn’t sufficient to say that the whole government knew and agreed upon anything. It’s a company saying something at the end of the day. It’s a company saying stuff I agree with, but if I operated on just what companies said, I’d be a Pfizer pincushion. So I don’t roll that way.
The opinion of one government contractor versus the opinion of the government is what happened.
From DARPA Report
The reason the disease is so confusing is because it is less a virus than it is engineered spike proteins hitch-hiking a ride on a SARSr-CoV quasispecies swarm. The closer it is to the final live attenuated vaccine form, the more likely that it has been deattenuating since initial escape in August 2019.
The gene-encoded, or “mRNA,” vaccines work poorly because they are synthetic replications of the already-synthetic SARSr-CoV-WIV synthetic spike proteins and possess no other epitopes. The mRNA instructs the cells to produce synthetic copies of the SARSr-CoV-WIV synthetic spike protein directly into the bloodstream, wherein they spread and produce the same ACE2 immune storm that the recombinant vaccine does. Many doctors in the country have identified that the symptoms of vaccine reactions mirror the symptoms of the disease, which corroborates with the similar synthetic nature and function of the respective spike proteins.
The vaccine recipient has no defense against the bloodstream entry, but their nose protects them from the recombinant spike protein quasispecies during “natural infection” (better termed as aerosolized inoculation).
Ivermectin (identified as curative in April 2020) works throughout all phases of illness because it both inhibits viral replication and modulates the immune response. Of note, chloroquine phosphate (Hydroxychloroquine, identified April 2020 as curative) is identified in the (2018 EchoHealth Funding application to DARPA) proposal as a SARSr-CoV inhibitor, as is interferon (identified May 2020 as curative).
A technological challenge as difficult as inoculating bats in China would be tried at DARPA first. The massive, “Manhattan Project”-level of information suppression executed by the government and the Trusted News Initiative indicates that it would be covered-up if something bad happened. The lab-leak hypothesis and squabbling between Senator Paul and Dr. Fauci indicated that the cover up was more localized. Further, an actual cover-up would be more disciplined with its paperwork. So, I presumed that unclassified files would be concealed on a higher network and found them where I expected them to be. I understood what they were and their content, pushed the files off-site, and compiled this report.
https://redstate.com/jenvanlaar/2022/01/11/new-us-military-report-states-covid-19-was-created-by-a-us-funded-ecohealth-alliance-program-at-wuhan-institute-of-virology-n504679
the documents, an August 2021 report to the Inspector General of the Department of Defense: “SARS-CoV-2 matches the SARS vaccine variants the NIH-EcoHealth program was making in Wuhan.”
https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/leaked-docs-reveal-government-ignored-evidence-about-covid-shots-cures-fauci-funded-research/
See source post for further links
https://communities.win/p/141YS5lNxu/what-has-happened-about-major-jo/
No it seems information was withheld
Major Murphy states clearly that in 2018 HCQ was indentified by Ecohealth as an effective coronavirus treatment in its DARPA funding application which was turned down by DARPA for the gain of function risks.
He also says that by early 2020 DARPA had identified HCQ, Ivermectin as effective against all stages of Covid. DARPA identified other drugs around the same time
See DARPA research on Amodaquine in link below in early 2020
https://communities.win/c/GreatAwakening/p/141YS1Ci5Y/april-2020-us-military-darpa-ask/c
These are simple examples of withheld info
The same goes for the coronavirus bat vaccine to be developed at Wuhan set out in the EchoHealth DARPA 2018 funding application which also involved paying 1/2 of Prof Shi's (the WIV bat lady) salary plus Prof Baric at Chapel Hill.
NIH EchoHealth funding has not been properly disclosed or if the bat vaccine was developed as originally set out and if so what happened to the bat vaccine
Major Murphy states he had access to classified reports
He also explains why the vaccines do not work. No one has set out why this is not correct - this may be more subjective but he then goes on to state that the data he has seen leads him and those who have advised him to believe the vaccines are toxic and dangerous as they create the same effects as the virus and go on producing these spikes around the whole body.
Go and read all the links posted with the source post - its too time consuming to keep posting the same data
The opinion of one government contractor versus the opinion of the government.
The opinion of one government contractor versus the opinion of the government.
I agree that it’s harmful and that eco health is clearly at least partially responsible, but they are not the entire federal government.
Parts of the Federal Govt are withholding vital information including that DARPA had shown in early 2020 that ivermectin and HCQ were effective against all stages of Covid
Major Murphy states HCQ and ivermectin were identified in early 2020 as effective against all stages of Covid by DARPA along with other drugs and that EchoHealth stated in 2018 HCQ was effective against coronaviruses in its funding application.
This EchoHealth data would have been available to NIH and Dr Fauci EchoHealth's final Wuhan funder
Also see separate verification of the same for Amodaquine in public research done for DARPA at the same time in early 2020 Major Murphy says this was happening for a range of drugs
https://www.wired.com/story/hydroxychloroquine-is-toast-now-say-hi-to-its-dirty-cousin/
https://communities.win/c/NoNewNormal/p/141EwQBfMn/
I agree with you that hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin are helpful, but ecohealth alone isn’t sufficient weight to pull the entire government to this conclusion. It’s proof of a dissent in opinions, but not proof of much beyond that. Ecohealth alliance is not the arbiter of truth for DARPA or the us government, nor would we want them to be fully. It’s the same problem as the Wuhan Lab doing covid fact checking. It’s a unreliable source with a vested interest. It’s important information and it’s indicative of more investigation but it itself isn’t sufficient to say that the whole government knew and agreed upon anything. It’s a company saying something at the end of the day. It’s a company saying stuff I agree with, but if I operated on just what companies said, I’d be a Pfizer pincushion. So I don’t roll that way.