Major Murphy states clearly that in 2018 HCQ was indentified by Ecohealth as an effective coronavirus treatment in its DARPA funding application which was turned down by DARPA for the gain of function risks.
He also says that by early 2020 DARPA had identified HCQ, Ivermectin as effective against all stages of Covid. DARPA identified other drugs around the same time
See DARPA research on Amodaquine in link below in early 2020
The same goes for the coronavirus bat vaccine to be developed at Wuhan set out in the EchoHealth DARPA 2018 funding application which also involved paying 1/2 of Prof Shi's (the WIV bat lady) salary plus Prof Baric at Chapel Hill.
NIH EchoHealth funding has not been properly disclosed or if the bat vaccine was developed as originally set out and if so what happened to the bat vaccine
Major Murphy states he had access to classified reports
He also explains why the vaccines do not work. No one has set out why this is not correct - this may be more subjective but he then goes on to state that the data he has seen leads him and those who have advised him to believe the vaccines are toxic and dangerous as they create the same effects as the virus and go on producing these spikes around the whole body.
Go and read all the links posted with the source post - its too time consuming to keep posting the same data
Parts of the Federal Govt are withholding vital information including that DARPA had shown in early 2020 that ivermectin and HCQ were effective against all stages of Covid
Major Murphy states HCQ and ivermectin were identified in early 2020 as effective against all stages of Covid by DARPA along with other drugs and that EchoHealth stated in 2018 HCQ was effective against coronaviruses in its funding application.
This EchoHealth data would have been available to NIH and Dr Fauci EchoHealth's final Wuhan funder
Also see separate verification of the same for Amodaquine in public research done for DARPA at the same time in early 2020 Major Murphy says this was happening for a range of drugs
and that EchoHealth stated in 2018 HCQ was effective against coronaviruses in its funding
This EchoHealth data would have been available to NIH and Dr Fauci EchoHealth's final Wuhan funder
I agree with you that hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin are helpful, but ecohealth alone isn’t sufficient weight to pull the entire government to this conclusion. It’s proof of a dissent in opinions, but not proof of much beyond that. Ecohealth alliance is not the arbiter of truth for DARPA or the us government, nor would we want them to be fully. It’s the same problem as the Wuhan Lab doing covid fact checking. It’s a unreliable source with a vested interest. It’s important information and it’s indicative of more investigation but it itself isn’t sufficient to say that the whole government knew and agreed upon anything. It’s a company saying something at the end of the day. It’s a company saying stuff I agree with, but if I operated on just what companies said, I’d be a Pfizer pincushion. So I don’t roll that way.
Major Murphy says very clearly that DARPA researchers concluded by April 2020 that Ivermectin and HCQ were effective against all stages of Covid.
He also states that other meds were also effective
This research was totally separate from EchoHealth's research findings.
I then gave you links to Ichan School of Medicine saying they did testing on Amodaquine at DARPAs specific request, a drug close to HCQ, which was also very effective against Covid at all stages. See the link below. This data was suppressed by people in the Federal Government. The FDA did not promote trials on it despite the great results in hamsters at all stages of Covid infection
The FDA also did not follow up this research or that on the (cheap easy to make and give to patients) drug GS-441524 shown to be 100% effective against FIP a 100% fatal cat coronavirus and preferred in cat trials to Remdesivir which was approved by the FDA to treat Covid in people but which has little medical benefit and is linked to multiple fatal side effects
In August 2020 the FDA confirmed in writing to ICAN that GS-441524 should be researched but like Ivermectin and HCQ no effective FDA trials have been done
Further the doses of HCQ given to patients in trials conducted that the FDA refers to were given at levels that are well known to be dangerous to fatal and resulted in deaths and HCQ being deemed ineffective. This dosage data is clearly set out in the medical literature so calls into question the actions of the supervising Drs
Further medical tests done on 8000 hospital patients in Belgium using the normal dose oh HCQ did not cause deaths and found a 40% reduction in deaths from Covid allowing for age, level of illness, comorbidities etc from those not receiving HCQ but these trials have not been followed upon.
Check Dr John Campbell for youtube videos on HCQ and google GS-441524 or look at posts in win with links to what has gone on
There are people in the Federal Govt who have suppressed this data on a wide range of drugs that are cheap and cure Covid
Major Murphy shows that DARPA had the data and did its own trials showing various drugs cured and stopped covid at all stages and clearly had access to other medical data as it specifically asked Ichan researchers to look at Amodaquine
No it seems information was withheld
Major Murphy states clearly that in 2018 HCQ was indentified by Ecohealth as an effective coronavirus treatment in its DARPA funding application which was turned down by DARPA for the gain of function risks.
He also says that by early 2020 DARPA had identified HCQ, Ivermectin as effective against all stages of Covid. DARPA identified other drugs around the same time
See DARPA research on Amodaquine in link below in early 2020
https://communities.win/c/GreatAwakening/p/141YS1Ci5Y/april-2020-us-military-darpa-ask/c
These are simple examples of withheld info
The same goes for the coronavirus bat vaccine to be developed at Wuhan set out in the EchoHealth DARPA 2018 funding application which also involved paying 1/2 of Prof Shi's (the WIV bat lady) salary plus Prof Baric at Chapel Hill.
NIH EchoHealth funding has not been properly disclosed or if the bat vaccine was developed as originally set out and if so what happened to the bat vaccine
Major Murphy states he had access to classified reports
He also explains why the vaccines do not work. No one has set out why this is not correct - this may be more subjective but he then goes on to state that the data he has seen leads him and those who have advised him to believe the vaccines are toxic and dangerous as they create the same effects as the virus and go on producing these spikes around the whole body.
Go and read all the links posted with the source post - its too time consuming to keep posting the same data
The opinion of one government contractor versus the opinion of the government.
The opinion of one government contractor versus the opinion of the government.
I agree that it’s harmful and that eco health is clearly at least partially responsible, but they are not the entire federal government.
Parts of the Federal Govt are withholding vital information including that DARPA had shown in early 2020 that ivermectin and HCQ were effective against all stages of Covid
Major Murphy states HCQ and ivermectin were identified in early 2020 as effective against all stages of Covid by DARPA along with other drugs and that EchoHealth stated in 2018 HCQ was effective against coronaviruses in its funding application.
This EchoHealth data would have been available to NIH and Dr Fauci EchoHealth's final Wuhan funder
Also see separate verification of the same for Amodaquine in public research done for DARPA at the same time in early 2020 Major Murphy says this was happening for a range of drugs
https://www.wired.com/story/hydroxychloroquine-is-toast-now-say-hi-to-its-dirty-cousin/
https://communities.win/c/NoNewNormal/p/141EwQBfMn/
I agree with you that hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin are helpful, but ecohealth alone isn’t sufficient weight to pull the entire government to this conclusion. It’s proof of a dissent in opinions, but not proof of much beyond that. Ecohealth alliance is not the arbiter of truth for DARPA or the us government, nor would we want them to be fully. It’s the same problem as the Wuhan Lab doing covid fact checking. It’s a unreliable source with a vested interest. It’s important information and it’s indicative of more investigation but it itself isn’t sufficient to say that the whole government knew and agreed upon anything. It’s a company saying something at the end of the day. It’s a company saying stuff I agree with, but if I operated on just what companies said, I’d be a Pfizer pincushion. So I don’t roll that way.
Major Murphy says very clearly that DARPA researchers concluded by April 2020 that Ivermectin and HCQ were effective against all stages of Covid.
He also states that other meds were also effective
This research was totally separate from EchoHealth's research findings.
I then gave you links to Ichan School of Medicine saying they did testing on Amodaquine at DARPAs specific request, a drug close to HCQ, which was also very effective against Covid at all stages. See the link below. This data was suppressed by people in the Federal Government. The FDA did not promote trials on it despite the great results in hamsters at all stages of Covid infection
https://www.wired.com/story/hydroxychloroquine-is-toast-now-say-hi-to-its-dirty-cousin/
The FDA also did not follow up this research or that on the (cheap easy to make and give to patients) drug GS-441524 shown to be 100% effective against FIP a 100% fatal cat coronavirus and preferred in cat trials to Remdesivir which was approved by the FDA to treat Covid in people but which has little medical benefit and is linked to multiple fatal side effects
In August 2020 the FDA confirmed in writing to ICAN that GS-441524 should be researched but like Ivermectin and HCQ no effective FDA trials have been done
Further the doses of HCQ given to patients in trials conducted that the FDA refers to were given at levels that are well known to be dangerous to fatal and resulted in deaths and HCQ being deemed ineffective. This dosage data is clearly set out in the medical literature so calls into question the actions of the supervising Drs
Further medical tests done on 8000 hospital patients in Belgium using the normal dose oh HCQ did not cause deaths and found a 40% reduction in deaths from Covid allowing for age, level of illness, comorbidities etc from those not receiving HCQ but these trials have not been followed upon.
Check Dr John Campbell for youtube videos on HCQ and google GS-441524 or look at posts in win with links to what has gone on
There are people in the Federal Govt who have suppressed this data on a wide range of drugs that are cheap and cure Covid
Major Murphy shows that DARPA had the data and did its own trials showing various drugs cured and stopped covid at all stages and clearly had access to other medical data as it specifically asked Ichan researchers to look at Amodaquine