Looking at table 14 (also see link to report below) the unvaccinated consistently have the lowest age-standardised case of infection per 100,000 people, thereby one could assume their immune systems are on average “better” at resisting infection than single, double and triple vaccinated people.

When you look at Tables 15 and 16, single and double vaccinated people on average have a higher rate of age-standardised hospital admissions and death per 100,000 people than the unvaccinated. This is consistent with above that unvaccinated immune systems are on average “better” at fighting infection than single and double vaccinated people. However, the data indicates the opposite is true for triple vaccinated people (i.e. lower age-standardised hospital admissions and death per 100,000 people) compared with the unvaccinated.

The MSM would use this data to highlight the importance of the booster, but our immune systems don’t get Alzheimer’s, once the ace binding receptor learns to bind to spike protein our immune system does not forget. Proof of this is how people who contracted SARS 17 years ago have natural immunity to COVID, despite the genetic code being ~20% different (will chase down the reference).

My theory is the lower hospital admissions and death of the triple vaccinated is related to the vaccine “pre-culling” the weak and susceptible proportion of the triple vaccinated population prior to any being infected with COVID and dying in the real world, thereby inflating the effectiveness of the vaccines?

Either way, the data appears contradictory and thus warrants further investigation. Keen for people’s critical analysis of this Hypothesis

link to report at https://www.publichealthscotland.scot/media/11404/22-02-02-covid19-winter_publication_report.pdf