Ah, but can you really be done discussing without ever beginning to discuss?
Once again, please notice (for your benefit) that you could not cite my "claim" (that you misunderstood) and were unable to answer two simple questions honestly. The questions were asked for your benefit!
Actually, you failed to answer 2 simple questions and then made incorrect claims about what I said (based on your misunderstanding) which you couldn't support.
I agree that your forgone conclusion of "you're wrong" prevented you from discussing anything.
nobody gives a fuck what you think, because you're a stupid, shit-fed, flat Earth barking, illiteratti monkey,
Spoken like a true intellectual ;)
Try to remember; Ad-hom is the last resort of the intellectually incompetent. They attack the thinker because they are too stupid to attack the thought instead. Intellectuals stick to attacking the thought! Just fyi!
WHoooSH: that's over your head.
No, I understand it perfectly well - and why it is incorrect. But I am trying to help YOU understand that. It's tough, because you haven't given it enough thought and all I can do to try and change that is ask questions (which you categorically refuse to answer)
Do you think you are in a fictional 19th century english novel? This is real life, and you are really failing to understand this conversation.
When you show up with that other, lesser known, working coordinates system that is predictive for the surface of this planet,
Lol. You don't understand why what you are saying is meaningless, but you MIGHT if you just answer 2 simple questions (that I specifically asked to help you, and you have avoided due to intellectual dishonesty)
You're gonna wear that no matter WHAT the fuck you try to claim.
You don't seem to understand what is happening here. I am trying to have a discussion (asking questions, providing analogy), and you are having an argument with yourself.
You can't "win" a discussion, but you can lose the plot :(
You clearly have no idea what I'm claiming, as evidenced by your complete inability to quote me.
Ah, but can you really be done discussing without ever beginning to discuss?
Once again, please notice (for your benefit) that you could not cite my "claim" (that you misunderstood) and were unable to answer two simple questions honestly. The questions were asked for your benefit!
Actually, you failed to answer 2 simple questions and then made incorrect claims about what I said (based on your misunderstanding) which you couldn't support.
I agree that your forgone conclusion of "you're wrong" prevented you from discussing anything.
Spoken like a true intellectual ;)
Try to remember; Ad-hom is the last resort of the intellectually incompetent. They attack the thinker because they are too stupid to attack the thought instead. Intellectuals stick to attacking the thought! Just fyi!
No, I understand it perfectly well - and why it is incorrect. But I am trying to help YOU understand that. It's tough, because you haven't given it enough thought and all I can do to try and change that is ask questions (which you categorically refuse to answer)
Do you think you are in a fictional 19th century english novel? This is real life, and you are really failing to understand this conversation.
Lol. You don't understand why what you are saying is meaningless, but you MIGHT if you just answer 2 simple questions (that I specifically asked to help you, and you have avoided due to intellectual dishonesty)
You don't seem to understand what is happening here. I am trying to have a discussion (asking questions, providing analogy), and you are having an argument with yourself.
You can't "win" a discussion, but you can lose the plot :(
You clearly have no idea what I'm claiming, as evidenced by your complete inability to quote me.