If the truth of what the cryptocracy has perpetrated is grasped and acted
upon, the consequences for the conspirators will be annihilation. But if
the people fail to perceive the truth or fail to act on their perception, thus
rendering unto the Process a kind of tacit consent born of apathy, amne-
sia and abulia, the consequence for the conspirators will be a giant step
in the advancement of their system of control, that is to say, ever tighter
bonds of enslavement for humanity.
Why does the cryptocracy bother to gamble so much by going public
with what it is doing to us? Because consent fuels their control like no
other form of energy.7
What if the biggest lie is the existence of truth? What if lie represents the contradiction of a consented to suggested truth? What if we exist within constant change; a change that communicates itself as moving inspiration; not as suggested information (aka names; brands; idols; affixed meaning...truths).
Nature neither offers false information towards perceiving senses; not does it proclaim anything within as true information. It inspires responses by moving life from inception towards death.
acted upon
Having choice implies being the "re-action" to perceived balance (need/want); not the re-sponse to suggested choices (want vs not want) and certainly not the source of any action.
the consequences for the conspirators will be annihilation
Aka "order out of chaos"; which represents the suggested inversion of life (form) representing temporary chaos out of the ongoing natural order (flow).
if the people fail to perceive the truth or fail to act on their perception...
That's the issue...the many ignore perceived (inspiration) for suggested (information) by the few. The parasitic behavior of the few represents the response to the choice of ignorance (want over need) by the many; an ignorance that also tempts the responding insolence of the few.
the advancement of their system of control
What advances the mind of the temporary responding form represents the ongoing source of flow. "free" will of choice represents the response to "dom"inance of balance aka free-dom; so form is controlled by flow; yet has the choice of how to be processed by it...need (growth) or want (loss)?
The few simply suggest the many to ignore being moved; while consenting to suggested progressivism aka going with the flow. The few suggest progression; achievements; goals; trophies; hopes; fears; career ladders; opportunities; level ups; sky is the limit; express yourself; living la vida loca; just do it and so on all to distract from form existing within the ever changing moment(um) of flow.
In short...life isn't outcome oriented; but a response (choice) to momentum (balance).
tighter bonds of enslavement
Enslavement (enslave mind) is based on choice to choice contract law aka choice suggesting (want over need) meets choice consenting (want or not want; while ignoring need). This simple inversion of natural law (balance/choice) was already industrialized for mass population control under the name of RELIGION, noun [Latin religio, to bind anew].
It's always the same bond (choice to choice); yet the continuous use of ignorance (want over need) corrupts ones comprehension of perceived (inspiration) with suggested (information). We think in words because we were domesticated by suggestion to consent to do so; while we ignore that perceived sound comes before suggested word; shaped by choice out of perceived sound as suggestible meaning (idols of information) aka spell-craft.
What if the biggest lie is the existence of truth? What if lie represents the contradiction of a consented to suggested truth? What if we exist within constant change; a change that communicates itself as moving inspiration; not as suggested information (aka names; brands; idols; affixed meaning...truths).
Nature neither offers false information towards perceiving senses; not does it proclaim anything within as true information. It inspires responses by moving life from inception towards death.
Having choice implies being the "re-action" to perceived balance (need/want); not the re-sponse to suggested choices (want vs not want) and certainly not the source of any action.
Aka "order out of chaos"; which represents the suggested inversion of life (form) representing temporary chaos out of the ongoing natural order (flow).
That's the issue...the many ignore perceived (inspiration) for suggested (information) by the few. The parasitic behavior of the few represents the response to the choice of ignorance (want over need) by the many; an ignorance that also tempts the responding insolence of the few.
What advances the mind of the temporary responding form represents the ongoing source of flow. "free" will of choice represents the response to "dom"inance of balance aka free-dom; so form is controlled by flow; yet has the choice of how to be processed by it...need (growth) or want (loss)?
The few simply suggest the many to ignore being moved; while consenting to suggested progressivism aka going with the flow. The few suggest progression; achievements; goals; trophies; hopes; fears; career ladders; opportunities; level ups; sky is the limit; express yourself; living la vida loca; just do it and so on all to distract from form existing within the ever changing moment(um) of flow.
In short...life isn't outcome oriented; but a response (choice) to momentum (balance).
Enslavement (enslave mind) is based on choice to choice contract law aka choice suggesting (want over need) meets choice consenting (want or not want; while ignoring need). This simple inversion of natural law (balance/choice) was already industrialized for mass population control under the name of RELIGION, noun [Latin religio, to bind anew].
It's always the same bond (choice to choice); yet the continuous use of ignorance (want over need) corrupts ones comprehension of perceived (inspiration) with suggested (information). We think in words because we were domesticated by suggestion to consent to do so; while we ignore that perceived sound comes before suggested word; shaped by choice out of perceived sound as suggestible meaning (idols of information) aka spell-craft.