3:28 If the sun were floating above us and just spinning around;
a) no matter how far away you are from the sun, you would always see it at night. Just like stars, photons don''t care about distance. The speed of light would force you to always see it since you are on a flat disc.
b) Our Sun sets, as in, sinks down below the equator. In a globe, you are standing on a ball that spins away from the sun, so you face away from the sun towards deep space.
c) explain a solar eclipse. Does the moon magically move down below the sun?
These two facts debunk flat earth 100%. I like how he says "It's not meant to be to scale". So why not make it to scale? Was he too stupid to do it, cause he knows he's wrong? he also claims the sun is "light limited attenuation". Haha ha, like WTF does that mean? You can only attenuate light using a physical shade, or wall, so is he saying that there are some walls stopping the sun from being seen when it's over North America? Because that is the only way you would not see the sun. Even if it were small, how could it illuminate all of North and South America yet magically stop being seen in Europe? This makes zero sense.
7:12 - are these peer-reviewed papers that are supported by the scientific community? 1000 to 1 - nope. If these people were correct, they would be winning a noble prize. But they don't because their experiments are crap.
7:53 - Rob says "it went the wrong way." No, it didn't - this fuck wit thinks it should have gone a different direction because he does not understand physics. The obvious question is; why does the pendulum change direction at all if the earth is flat?
10:17 when the moon and sun are in the same position (solar eclipse) the gravitational force is amplified. Of course, pendulums change, gravity is a thing dip shit. Gravitational waves will certainly be subject to refraction by bodies such as the moon and we explore if such an effect can result in an error in the apparent position of the sources and thereby give rise to the characteristic pattern of response associated with the eclipse anomaly
12:58 - There is no contradiction, you have to adjust for rotation. The graphic shown and the caption just proves this true. What a fuck wit, this guy is just dumb. He fails to understand inertia. Helicopters have inertial when you lift off. To counteract inertia you need a force like a propeller pushing you against inertia forces/
See, all this shit is just some fuck tard who simply does not understand physics. He is dumb and therefore compensates for his lack of understanding to invent these fanciful notions.
A) Atmospheric gases builds up over a distance, blocking our view of the sun. Kind off like a cloud would during daytime.
B) The sun sets due to how perspective works.
C) I do not think the Flat earth model has any problems with the moon blocking the sun during a solar eclipse. What I can say is that the sun moves faster then the moon, so the sun is the one who should be catching the moon. So in the Flat earth model, the sun should always get eclipsed from the west to the east direction, as the moon starts off ahead of the sun.
The moon and the sun has to be at the same place in the sky during a solar eclipse, which they are during a new moon. For Lunar eclipses, I know it is not the shadow of the earth blocking the moon, as both the moon and the sun has been observed above the horizon at the same time during lunar eclipses.
3:28 If the sun were floating above us and just spinning around;
a) no matter how far away you are from the sun, you would always see it at night. Just like stars, photons don''t care about distance. The speed of light would force you to always see it since you are on a flat disc.
b) Our Sun sets, as in, sinks down below the equator. In a globe, you are standing on a ball that spins away from the sun, so you face away from the sun towards deep space.
c) explain a solar eclipse. Does the moon magically move down below the sun?
These two facts debunk flat earth 100%. I like how he says "It's not meant to be to scale". So why not make it to scale? Was he too stupid to do it, cause he knows he's wrong? he also claims the sun is "light limited attenuation". Haha ha, like WTF does that mean? You can only attenuate light using a physical shade, or wall, so is he saying that there are some walls stopping the sun from being seen when it's over North America? Because that is the only way you would not see the sun. Even if it were small, how could it illuminate all of North and South America yet magically stop being seen in Europe? This makes zero sense.
7:12 - are these peer-reviewed papers that are supported by the scientific community? 1000 to 1 - nope. If these people were correct, they would be winning a noble prize. But they don't because their experiments are crap.
7:53 - Rob says "it went the wrong way." No, it didn't - this fuck wit thinks it should have gone a different direction because he does not understand physics. The obvious question is; why does the pendulum change direction at all if the earth is flat?
10:17 when the moon and sun are in the same position (solar eclipse) the gravitational force is amplified. Of course, pendulums change, gravity is a thing dip shit. Gravitational waves will certainly be subject to refraction by bodies such as the moon and we explore if such an effect can result in an error in the apparent position of the sources and thereby give rise to the characteristic pattern of response associated with the eclipse anomaly
12:58 - There is no contradiction, you have to adjust for rotation. The graphic shown and the caption just proves this true. What a fuck wit, this guy is just dumb. He fails to understand inertia. Helicopters have inertial when you lift off. To counteract inertia you need a force like a propeller pushing you against inertia forces/
See, all this shit is just some fuck tard who simply does not understand physics. He is dumb and therefore compensates for his lack of understanding to invent these fanciful notions.
Next.
A) Atmospheric gases builds up over a distance, blocking our view of the sun. Kind off like a cloud would during daytime.
B) The sun sets due to how perspective works.
C) I do not think the Flat earth model has any problems with the moon blocking the sun during a solar eclipse. What I can say is that the sun moves faster then the moon, so the sun is the one who should be catching the moon. So in the Flat earth model, the sun should always get eclipsed from the west to the east direction, as the moon starts off ahead of the sun.
lol, are you kidding me? That's a first, ha ha.
Oh right, light disappears cause perspective - should have known. ha ha. That;s also a first
To create a solar eclipse, the moon has to be lower than the sun correct? Then explain how a lunar eclipse works.
The moon and the sun has to be at the same place in the sky during a solar eclipse, which they are during a new moon. For Lunar eclipses, I know it is not the shadow of the earth blocking the moon, as both the moon and the sun has been observed above the horizon at the same time during lunar eclipses.
Then what is?