3:28 If the sun were floating above us and just spinning around;
a) no matter how far away you are from the sun, you would always see it at night. Just like stars, photons don''t care about distance. The speed of light would force you to always see it since you are on a flat disc.
b) Our Sun sets, as in, sinks down below the equator. In a globe, you are standing on a ball that spins away from the sun, so you face away from the sun towards deep space.
c) explain a solar eclipse. Does the moon magically move down below the sun?
These two facts debunk flat earth 100%. I like how he says "It's not meant to be to scale". So why not make it to scale? Was he too stupid to do it, cause he knows he's wrong? he also claims the sun is "light limited attenuation". Haha ha, like WTF does that mean? You can only attenuate light using a physical shade, or wall, so is he saying that there are some walls stopping the sun from being seen when it's over North America? Because that is the only way you would not see the sun. Even if it were small, how could it illuminate all of North and South America yet magically stop being seen in Europe? This makes zero sense.
7:12 - are these peer-reviewed papers that are supported by the scientific community? 1000 to 1 - nope. If these people were correct, they would be winning a noble prize. But they don't because their experiments are crap.
7:53 - Rob says "it went the wrong way." No, it didn't - this fuck wit thinks it should have gone a different direction because he does not understand physics. The obvious question is; why does the pendulum change direction at all if the earth is flat?
10:17 when the moon and sun are in the same position (solar eclipse) the gravitational force is amplified. Of course, pendulums change, gravity is a thing dip shit. Gravitational waves will certainly be subject to refraction by bodies such as the moon and we explore if such an effect can result in an error in the apparent position of the sources and thereby give rise to the characteristic pattern of response associated with the eclipse anomaly
12:58 - There is no contradiction, you have to adjust for rotation. The graphic shown and the caption just proves this true. What a fuck wit, this guy is just dumb. He fails to understand inertia. Helicopters have inertial when you lift off. To counteract inertia you need a force like a propeller pushing you against inertia forces/
See, all this shit is just some fuck tard who simply does not understand physics. He is dumb and therefore compensates for his lack of understanding to invent these fanciful notions.
A) Atmospheric gases builds up over a distance, blocking our view of the sun. Kind off like a cloud would during daytime.
B) The sun sets due to how perspective works.
C) I do not think the Flat earth model has any problems with the moon blocking the sun during a solar eclipse. What I can say is that the sun moves faster then the moon, so the sun is the one who should be catching the moon. So in the Flat earth model, the sun should always get eclipsed from the west to the east direction, as the moon starts off ahead of the sun.
The moon and the sun has to be at the same place in the sky during a solar eclipse, which they are during a new moon. For Lunar eclipses, I know it is not the shadow of the earth blocking the moon, as both the moon and the sun has been observed above the horizon at the same time during lunar eclipses.
I do not know. The moon is doing it to it self, as far as I can tell. The moon becoming as blood is in the Bible though, so I would say it is a warning to us that Jesus blood has been shed.
Religious people will learn the hard way, grab yourself some kneepads for praying comfort. You will need it Christcucks. Oh noes the four horseman and Satan.
The number of the Beast is a reference to the final Antichrist known as Solomon, and the creation of the counterfeit Bible known as Wormwood, which you can read about its construction in Song of Solomon. You need the AV 1611, the one in middle English, to have the holy Spirit teach you this doctrine though, as a single word change is enough to corrupt prophecy. A little leaven leavens the hole lump, as Jesus said. Let the Lord be true, and every man a lier. The one who tells, You shall be as Gods, is the serpent.
There is a difference between God, Gods and gods. God, with a capital G, is a reference to the Creator, Lord Jesus Christ. While gods, with no capital g, is a reference to a creation, like Adam and Eve. Another reason you need the AV1611, as the KJV revised in 1769 by Blaney, managed to change the capitalisation, so this teaching was lost.
You are right to point out that Jesus confirmed that we are gods. What the serpent say has to be a lie, as that is his natural tongue, and Jesus can not lie, so the right rendition of what the serpent said is, You shal be as Gods, which is the lie told us, as later on in that chapter Lord Jesus Christ confirms that we know good and evil (Gen 3:22).
Stop making shit up AV 1611 - Here is wisdom. Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast: for it is the number of a man; and his number is Six hundred threescore and six. Revelation 13:18
7 I charge you, O ye daughters of Ierusalem, by the Roes, and by the hindes of the field, that ye stirre not vp, nor awake my loue, till she please.
It is a drunk woman in the arms of Solomon, sleeping. Which is important for prophecy, as we met that same woman again in Revelation, drinking the wine of fornication.
Wisdom is also spiritually equivalent of gold, so Rev 13:18 is a reference to 1 King 10:14.
A gyroscope proves the Earth isn't spinning. A water level tool proves it's flat. It's that easy.
Holy, the proof for flat Earth is here, and you're ignoring it. kek
Holly faggot, what's wrong? Can't deboooonk this one?
Holly faggot. Why didn't you tackle this one? kek
3:28 If the sun were floating above us and just spinning around;
a) no matter how far away you are from the sun, you would always see it at night. Just like stars, photons don''t care about distance. The speed of light would force you to always see it since you are on a flat disc.
b) Our Sun sets, as in, sinks down below the equator. In a globe, you are standing on a ball that spins away from the sun, so you face away from the sun towards deep space.
c) explain a solar eclipse. Does the moon magically move down below the sun?
These two facts debunk flat earth 100%. I like how he says "It's not meant to be to scale". So why not make it to scale? Was he too stupid to do it, cause he knows he's wrong? he also claims the sun is "light limited attenuation". Haha ha, like WTF does that mean? You can only attenuate light using a physical shade, or wall, so is he saying that there are some walls stopping the sun from being seen when it's over North America? Because that is the only way you would not see the sun. Even if it were small, how could it illuminate all of North and South America yet magically stop being seen in Europe? This makes zero sense.
7:12 - are these peer-reviewed papers that are supported by the scientific community? 1000 to 1 - nope. If these people were correct, they would be winning a noble prize. But they don't because their experiments are crap.
7:53 - Rob says "it went the wrong way." No, it didn't - this fuck wit thinks it should have gone a different direction because he does not understand physics. The obvious question is; why does the pendulum change direction at all if the earth is flat?
10:17 when the moon and sun are in the same position (solar eclipse) the gravitational force is amplified. Of course, pendulums change, gravity is a thing dip shit. Gravitational waves will certainly be subject to refraction by bodies such as the moon and we explore if such an effect can result in an error in the apparent position of the sources and thereby give rise to the characteristic pattern of response associated with the eclipse anomaly
12:58 - There is no contradiction, you have to adjust for rotation. The graphic shown and the caption just proves this true. What a fuck wit, this guy is just dumb. He fails to understand inertia. Helicopters have inertial when you lift off. To counteract inertia you need a force like a propeller pushing you against inertia forces/
See, all this shit is just some fuck tard who simply does not understand physics. He is dumb and therefore compensates for his lack of understanding to invent these fanciful notions.
Next.
A) Atmospheric gases builds up over a distance, blocking our view of the sun. Kind off like a cloud would during daytime.
B) The sun sets due to how perspective works.
C) I do not think the Flat earth model has any problems with the moon blocking the sun during a solar eclipse. What I can say is that the sun moves faster then the moon, so the sun is the one who should be catching the moon. So in the Flat earth model, the sun should always get eclipsed from the west to the east direction, as the moon starts off ahead of the sun.
lol, are you kidding me? That's a first, ha ha.
Oh right, light disappears cause perspective - should have known. ha ha. That;s also a first
To create a solar eclipse, the moon has to be lower than the sun correct? Then explain how a lunar eclipse works.
The moon and the sun has to be at the same place in the sky during a solar eclipse, which they are during a new moon. For Lunar eclipses, I know it is not the shadow of the earth blocking the moon, as both the moon and the sun has been observed above the horizon at the same time during lunar eclipses.
Then what is?
I do not know. The moon is doing it to it self, as far as I can tell. The moon becoming as blood is in the Bible though, so I would say it is a warning to us that Jesus blood has been shed.
Lol, you flat earthers are all the same. Too stupid to understand what your own eyes tell you. Please don't have children.
Thank you for posting something intelligent on this site.
https://imgur.com/H7UIYTs
Religious people will learn the hard way, grab yourself some kneepads for praying comfort. You will need it Christcucks. Oh noes the four horseman and Satan.
The number of the Beast is a reference to the final Antichrist known as Solomon, and the creation of the counterfeit Bible known as Wormwood, which you can read about its construction in Song of Solomon. You need the AV 1611, the one in middle English, to have the holy Spirit teach you this doctrine though, as a single word change is enough to corrupt prophecy. A little leaven leavens the hole lump, as Jesus said. Let the Lord be true, and every man a lier. The one who tells, You shall be as Gods, is the serpent.
There is a difference between God, Gods and gods. God, with a capital G, is a reference to the Creator, Lord Jesus Christ. While gods, with no capital g, is a reference to a creation, like Adam and Eve. Another reason you need the AV1611, as the KJV revised in 1769 by Blaney, managed to change the capitalisation, so this teaching was lost.
You are right to point out that Jesus confirmed that we are gods. What the serpent say has to be a lie, as that is his natural tongue, and Jesus can not lie, so the right rendition of what the serpent said is, You shal be as Gods, which is the lie told us, as later on in that chapter Lord Jesus Christ confirms that we know good and evil (Gen 3:22).
What does this have to do with the earth being flat?
Stop making shit up AV 1611 - Here is wisdom. Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast: for it is the number of a man; and his number is Six hundred threescore and six. Revelation 13:18
Every edition is exactly the same, it's called divide and conquer. https://imgur.com/H7UIYTs
Song of Solomon 2
7 I charge you, O ye daughters of Ierusalem, by the Roes, and by the hindes of the field, that ye stirre not vp, nor awake my loue, till she please.
It is a drunk woman in the arms of Solomon, sleeping. Which is important for prophecy, as we met that same woman again in Revelation, drinking the wine of fornication.
Wisdom is also spiritually equivalent of gold, so Rev 13:18 is a reference to 1 King 10:14.
atheists are the useful idiots of jews