Fourteen days.
Believe the blueprint.
The entirely of us goes to the same whereabouts of a single individual.
Nationalists are in charge.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (7)
sorted by:
Notice two things here...a) -des; from -dis - "lack of; not; apart; away" and b) pair from par - "couple; to join".
What if as ONE within ALL; consenting to the suggestions of another causes the "pair" and the resulting "lack of" towards the perceived ONEness of ALL aka the perceived U'NITY, noun [Latin unitas.] - "the state of being one; oneness" instead of the suggested togetherness.
To consent to suggested implies choice submitting to choice aka contract law; also called RELIGION, noun [Latin religio, to bind anew; re and ligo, to bind.]. The original bond under natural law implies choice responding to perceived balance (need/want); while resisting the temptation of suggested choices by others (want vs not want).
Who suggested those brands; who consented to those suggested brands, and who holds the power to define; redefine and contradict meaning in the name of those suggested brands for all those consenting to it?
What if these names (all names; all words; all languages; all suggested information) represent idolatry (idolized meaning; that when suggested; tempts those consenting to ignore perceived meaning)? Question spell-craft aka "crafting the spelling of others through suggestion"?
A little less like "abracadabra" and a little more like "Insane" (in sanus aka within sound) + "Person" (per sonos aka by sound) aka the difference between suggested words "Insane Person" and perceived sound "within and by sound"...defined by ones free will of choice.