a) PROTEST', verb intransitive [Latin protestor; pro and testor, to affirm it.]
b) the few suggest (lockdown; mask; vax); the many consent by wanting or not wanting the same suggestion; hence affirming it.
c) the many use suggestion (-isms) to cause division (reason) among the many.
Example...the few suggest abortion; the many consent by either wanting or not wanting it; which puts both sides into the conflict of reason (want vs not want). The few then rebrand both sides as pro-life vs pro-choice; while keeping the conflict going by suggesting endless contradictions to both sides (talmudic reasoning).
This way...a) blood libel; human sacrifice; gentile genocide etc. (abortion) can run unopposed for over half a century and counting; b) the few that suggest gain control over both sides of the many who consent to the suggested, and c) for those with eyes to see the few can disclose their sleight of hand aka "life equals choice"; which those reasoning as pro-life vs pro-choice cannot comprehend; since they chose want over need.
In short...choice represents the response to perceived balance (need/want); not to the suggested imbalance (want vs not want) from the choices of others.
a) PROTEST', verb intransitive [Latin protestor; pro and testor, to affirm it.]
b) the few suggest (lockdown; mask; vax); the many consent by wanting or not wanting the same suggestion; hence affirming it.
c) the many use suggestion (-isms) to cause division (reason) among the many.
Example...the few suggest abortion; the many consent by either wanting or not wanting it; which puts both sides into the conflict of reason (want vs not want). The few then rebrand both sides as pro-life vs pro-choice; while keeping the conflict going by suggesting endless contradictions to both sides (talmudic reasoning).
This way...a) blood libel; human sacrifice; gentile genocide etc. (abortion) can run unopposed for over half a century and counting; b) the few that suggest gain control over both sides of the many who consent to the suggested, and c) for those with eyes to see the few can disclose their sleight of hand aka "life equals choice"; which those reasoning as pro-life vs pro-choice cannot comprehend; since they chose want over need.
In short...choice represents the response to perceived balance (need/want); not to the suggested imbalance (want vs not want) from the choices of others.