Since i am a participant in a conspiracy board I have to assume that such concepts as controlled opposition are valid.
In such case I will have to attribute that to certain actors.
My rationale in his case is that viewers have been "screaming" for him to invite in his "investigation" committee doctors who have ample evidence that a novel coronavirus never existed but...he never does.
He has been inviting spiritualists, naturopaths but somehow ignores such professionals.
Would that not constitute part of his investigation?
Or are we not allowed to disprove the existence of God (SARS CoV 2) in this religion?
Because if God does not exist any debates about the Holy Trinity, the meaning of Holy Spirit, Orthodox vs Catholic vs Protestant vs. herecies (masks, lockdowns, vaccines, therapeutics, vaccine mandates, halth passes) becomes irrelevant.
So, where does this community stand in this matter?
Are we allowed to challenge mainstream consensus or not?
Since i am a participant in a conspiracy board I have to assume that such concepts as controlled opposition are valid.
In such case I will have to attribute that to certain actors.
My rationale in his case is that viewers have been "screaming" for him to invite in his "investigation" committee doctors who have ample evidence that a novel coronavirus never existed but...he never does.
He has been inviting spiritualists, naturopaths but somehow ignores such professionals.
Would that not constitute part of his investigation?
Or are we not allowed to disprove the existence of God (SARS CoV 2) in this religion?
Because if God does not exist any debates about the Holy Trinity, the meaning of Holy Spirit, Orthodox vs Catholic vs Protestant vs. herecies (masks, lockdowns, vaccines, therapeutics, vaccine mandates, halth passes) becomes irrelevant.
So, where does this community stand in this matter?
Are we allowed to challenge mainstream consensus or not?