Comments (3)
sorted by:
GynaNumbaZero 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yeah, that one was a red herring to me. There'd be too many people to fool at the manufacturing level to do that.

pkvi [S] 4 points ago +4 / -0

Ayh think one argument was tainting some batches and ensuring some batches go to "the right people"

Ayh still don't buy the depop angle to the vax. Ayh prefer the experiment, gene editing and exploitation with zero consequence angle.

factdigger 3 points ago +3 / -0

PKVI, you are again JUMPING the gun.

Yes, they are all bad, but YES there IS CLEAR evidence of more hot batches. Even Jessica Rose admits this (in the comments of the article, read them).

The adverse events plot for lot numbers is an exponential distribution, not a UNIFORM or GAUSSIAN distribution which should be expected.

BTW, Jessica's own study on this is still under construction.

She hasn't gone through all the data manually like the 4 other researchers who did the same analysis before she did and all arrived at the same conclusion.