"to seek" implies the choice of want over need; "information" implies suggested by; while inspiration implies perceived as. As form (life) within flow (inception towards death) there's only one source of ALL (flow) for each ONE (form) within.
Ask yourself why the few are in control over the flow of suggested information (MSM; education; entertainment; distribution etc.)? Ask yourself why any suggested information represents a conflict for ones choice (want vs not want); while choice implies the response to balance (need/want)? Ask yourself if RELIGION, noun [Latin religio, from religo, to bind anew.] implies choice (suggesting) to choice (consenting); then what if one ignores the original bond under natural law aka balance (offering) to choice (responding)?
How easy would it be to control the majority by suggesting them to believe that the few represent the source of suggested information; while they ignore to adapt to perceived inspiration?
it's important
Important implies "to bring from another state"; hence not information (from within form); but inspiration (from within spirit) aka spiro - "to breathe"; hence form to flow adaptation.
Ask yourself this...what if perceived inspiration implies sound; while suggested information implies choice shaping suggestible meaning (words) out of perceived sound as substitute meaning (brand; idol) to deceive others? Wouldn't that represent spell-craft aka suggesting shaped words to deceive those consenting to ignore perceived sound?
This is why it's important to seek information to what stresses you from more than one source, and from more than one point-of-view.
"to seek" implies the choice of want over need; "information" implies suggested by; while inspiration implies perceived as. As form (life) within flow (inception towards death) there's only one source of ALL (flow) for each ONE (form) within.
Ask yourself why the few are in control over the flow of suggested information (MSM; education; entertainment; distribution etc.)? Ask yourself why any suggested information represents a conflict for ones choice (want vs not want); while choice implies the response to balance (need/want)? Ask yourself if RELIGION, noun [Latin religio, from religo, to bind anew.] implies choice (suggesting) to choice (consenting); then what if one ignores the original bond under natural law aka balance (offering) to choice (responding)?
How easy would it be to control the majority by suggesting them to believe that the few represent the source of suggested information; while they ignore to adapt to perceived inspiration?
Important implies "to bring from another state"; hence not information (from within form); but inspiration (from within spirit) aka spiro - "to breathe"; hence form to flow adaptation.
Ask yourself this...what if perceived inspiration implies sound; while suggested information implies choice shaping suggestible meaning (words) out of perceived sound as substitute meaning (brand; idol) to deceive others? Wouldn't that represent spell-craft aka suggesting shaped words to deceive those consenting to ignore perceived sound?