Comments (43)
sorted by:
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
TimeTravelerGlowie 25 points ago +27 / -2

The absolute state of jewry.

NotGonnaDoIt -17 points ago +5 / -22

Crazy how .2% of the global population has bested the world. Assuming you believe that to be true, it's almost like they're better and smarter than you in every measurable way. "They" run the media, the schools, the government and the military but at least you have this honeypot to screech into, so it ain't all bad!

StopSmokingPOTFAGGOT 13 points ago +15 / -2

Shalom rabbi. It's not that difficult when they have multiple dozens of lobbyist groups. Acceptance to elite universities with lower grades and SAT scores. Scholarships and financial aid not available to others. Insane amounts of nepotism to benefit from. Keep deflecting, but the reality is these people are parasites that seek out positions of power and benefit from their own already. When 2% of your population makes up less than a third of 1% (0.33%) of enlisted soldiers in your millitary, yet are 50% of your active Generals. It's time to start asking questions

NotGonnaDoIt -4 points ago +3 / -7

OK, I have a question. How did they get into power?

Parcival 7 points ago +8 / -1

So are you a liberal? If so, you should be familiar with the liberal line about billionaires: It would be impossible for somebody to work 100,000,000% harder than the average worker, therefor billionaires could not possibly have earned their wealth. They acquire it only through exploitation and nepotism. So swap out "billionaire" with "jews". You don't really even need to, since so many billionaires are jews anyway.

StopSmokingPOTFAGGOT 5 points ago +7 / -2


Junionthepipeline 4 points ago +4 / -0

Like parasites. It's there business model.

DavidColeIntrepid 3 points ago +4 / -1

Child rape blackmail. Ex. Epstein

BlackDay2020 2 points ago +3 / -1

There are many factors. Examples:

  1. You can go far once you abandon moral principles when dealing with the out-group. No longer an even fight.

  2. You can also go far if you're continually told since birth your people are to rule and not to serve (the converse holds too). If one group is thinking only of their immediate concerns due to their upbringing, and another is thinking of taking over, the first group is blind to the takeover because they never thought to look for it.

  3. You can also go far if you're continually told since birth that it is your duty to help your people take over the world. Versus your duty only towards nation or family. In the second case, no one is doing anything to ensure survival of their group. Nationalism doesn't work because it's blind to the composition of the nation. While the first group will always promote their own first at the other's expense (parasitic behavior). The second group is blind to their exploitation because they are only looking at the sum total of national prosperity.

A nation with a homogeneous group can afford to and eventually does ignore concerns about the welfare of the group itself. It assumes its wealth, power etc. belongs to itself. But if said group allows another group to settle amongst them, that assumption need not be true anymore.

In short, it has everything to do with upbringing (the morality, the aims in life, the priorities etc.) It's a people's mistake to let another people takeover them, or tolerate anyone's (person or group) parasitic behavior.

NotGonnaDoIt -2 points ago +2 / -4

Everything you just mentioned can be applied to the goals of white nationlists/literal nazis. All you're really saying here is that jews beat them to the punch and were more successful.

BlackDay2020 5 points ago +5 / -0

Not true. White nationalists do not condition their young to rule. They do not condition their young for global takeover (a regional power vs a global one: This only works if the regional power is isolated from the world, and the global one isn't trying to invade). They don't condition their young to engage in parasitic behavior (white imperialists did that but white imperialists =/= white nationalists). They don't act from the shadows: They'd rather kill, exile or loot the out-group overtly. Hence, the out-group is not blind to their efforts, and can choose to oppose them. And finally, as you said, Jews have a head start.

But where they are united, they easily prevail due to numbers (eg: Hitler turned his poor Weimar Republic into one of the most feared superpowers in less than a decade, a feat that hasn't been repeated). However, the Nazis were in turn outnumbered by the much bigger global powers who were working for a different master.

Jews are a good example of what is possible, but other people might not be willing to go that far with moral latitude. I'd recommend any civilization (including the Jewish one) to disallow immigration. I don't hate Jews or Nazis, but as a group I'd keep my distance for my own safety.

deleted 0 points ago +1 / -1