Without "foreign interference" it is impossible to ask for CSTO (NATO equivalent for ex-USSR countries) help, since this organisation, like NATO, intended to provide mutual protection of members in case of foreing intrusion. So, if they need CSTO forces for some reason (to defeat another clan, f.e.), they have to declare "foreing interference", whether it really exist or not. Also, since officials began to talk about "terrorists", it is definitely a spectacle. No "terrorism" exists except organised by government to take away more freedoms from people.
More interesting fact, that with 50% of Russians in Kazakhstan population, only Kazhakhs participate in all that thing. At least that is what you could get from photos/images. If that was something spontaneous and really based on something social or political, there would have been many Russians among protesters. From the other side, Russians can't belong to any Kazakh clan at all.
However, if there was really some "foreing interference", it is highly improbable that western masters of puppets will allow participation of Russians in their plans. Some time ago, they openly predated Navalny and his supporters in Russia, when it became obvious for them that it is absolutely possible that Russians could really overthrow Putin and his gang of thieves, and the new Russian government could become highly anti-NWO (that was in some Navalny messages, he occasionally told some anti-narrative things that he should not tell loud to keep western support). They immidiately discard all agreements with Russian opposition and allow Putin to supress any protests.
So, while absence of Russians among protesters gives no clue about existence of "foreing interference", it definitely shows that protests are orchestrated and completely unnatural.
For now that is all I could concluse from what I know about Kazakhstan protests.
I think your theory makes the most sense. By foreign influence i mean that it’s NATO influence for geopolitical benefits. Though more likely than this is internal politics. You offer convincing scenario for this
ZH presenting some evidence of foreign interference though it is essentially hearsay
https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/dozens-killed-kazakh-police-battle-control-streets-war-zone-banks-being-looted
Without "foreign interference" it is impossible to ask for CSTO (NATO equivalent for ex-USSR countries) help, since this organisation, like NATO, intended to provide mutual protection of members in case of foreing intrusion. So, if they need CSTO forces for some reason (to defeat another clan, f.e.), they have to declare "foreing interference", whether it really exist or not. Also, since officials began to talk about "terrorists", it is definitely a spectacle. No "terrorism" exists except organised by government to take away more freedoms from people.
More interesting fact, that with 50% of Russians in Kazakhstan population, only Kazhakhs participate in all that thing. At least that is what you could get from photos/images. If that was something spontaneous and really based on something social or political, there would have been many Russians among protesters. From the other side, Russians can't belong to any Kazakh clan at all.
However, if there was really some "foreing interference", it is highly improbable that western masters of puppets will allow participation of Russians in their plans. Some time ago, they openly predated Navalny and his supporters in Russia, when it became obvious for them that it is absolutely possible that Russians could really overthrow Putin and his gang of thieves, and the new Russian government could become highly anti-NWO (that was in some Navalny messages, he occasionally told some anti-narrative things that he should not tell loud to keep western support). They immidiately discard all agreements with Russian opposition and allow Putin to supress any protests.
So, while absence of Russians among protesters gives no clue about existence of "foreing interference", it definitely shows that protests are orchestrated and completely unnatural.
For now that is all I could concluse from what I know about Kazakhstan protests.
I think your theory makes the most sense. By foreign influence i mean that it’s NATO influence for geopolitical benefits. Though more likely than this is internal politics. You offer convincing scenario for this