.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (17)
sorted by:
.
Now apply the same to the proclamation of truth...nature doesn't define truth; that's why others can exploit those who do through suggestion of lies. Something doesn't exist because one calls it true (want) or false (not want); but because it's being moved by nature (need). We each represent a response to perceived movement (constant change); not to affixed states suggested to us (true vs false).
You seem to not be able to understand my post. Less is more so don’t try so hard. You can always just up or down vote.
Adaptation to suggested nothing (not) doesn't define comprehension (understanding); adaptation to perceived inspiration from everything does.
That represents the conflict of reason (want vs not want); caused by consenting to suggested information (want) over perceived inspiration (need). I neither offer (no threads started); not judge (no up/down-votes given); hence representing free will of choice in response to balance.
I like you
LIKE, adjective - "equal in quantity, quality or degree". Each ONE within ALL represents a differentiation (form) out of the same (flow) aka form (life) out of flow (inception towards death).
The parasitic few suggest unity to shape the ignorant many alike (hence uniformity; miscegenation; globalism; chain of command etc.). What the many ignore is U'NITY, noun [Latin unitas.] - "the state of being one; oneness". We each represent ONE within ALL and ALL represents ONE in energy. Suggested togetherness implies the ignorance of ONEness.
In short...before choice "I like you" exists response ability "I am out of".