I don't necessarily disagree with your post, but it's important to note that international banking wanted the war and paid for the war on all sides.
About Hitler: he was either evil by the mainstream narrative, fucking strategically retarded by 'revisionist' narrative, and/or a useful idiot/puppet for international bankers. The only thing you could maybe argue about Hitler is that he had 'good intentions' for Europe.
If the 'final solution' really was emigration/evacuation, the germans really couldn't tell the difference between normal everyday people, and the bankers fucking with the economy? Why did Hitler accept funding from Jewish banks for the war?
WWII wasn't the last chance for anything, and it wasn't Marxism vs anything. It was international bankers puppeting all countries to further their own power and control. International bankers paid for Marx to write his book, yeah, but the bankers are also fond of monarchies, and republics etc. They really don't care about what form of government or economic system that we use as long as they control the money.
a) choice (ONE) represents response to perceived balance (ALL)...not to the suggested choices of others.
b) balance represents (ALL) value for (ONEs) responding choice of evaluation; while consenting to suggested value (money) by others devalues choice of evaluation. Why? Because consenting by choice to suggestion by choice of others; ignores using choice in response to balance.
c) money aka m--one--y aka "my one"; which implies a claim upon another ONE.
d) the few control the many who ignore to control themselves as choice within balance by suggesting them choices to follow.
All wars are banker's wars.
I don't necessarily disagree with your post, but it's important to note that international banking wanted the war and paid for the war on all sides.
About Hitler: he was either evil by the mainstream narrative, fucking strategically retarded by 'revisionist' narrative, and/or a useful idiot/puppet for international bankers. The only thing you could maybe argue about Hitler is that he had 'good intentions' for Europe.
If the 'final solution' really was emigration/evacuation, the germans really couldn't tell the difference between normal everyday people, and the bankers fucking with the economy? Why did Hitler accept funding from Jewish banks for the war?
WWII wasn't the last chance for anything, and it wasn't Marxism vs anything. It was international bankers puppeting all countries to further their own power and control. International bankers paid for Marx to write his book, yeah, but the bankers are also fond of monarchies, and republics etc. They really don't care about what form of government or economic system that we use as long as they control the money.
a) choice (ONE) represents response to perceived balance (ALL)...not to the suggested choices of others.
b) balance represents (ALL) value for (ONEs) responding choice of evaluation; while consenting to suggested value (money) by others devalues choice of evaluation. Why? Because consenting by choice to suggestion by choice of others; ignores using choice in response to balance.
c) money aka m--one--y aka "my one"; which implies a claim upon another ONE.
d) the few control the many who ignore to control themselves as choice within balance by suggesting them choices to follow.