Govern (to control) + ment (from mens; mind). What controls mind? Choice (in response to balance aka need/want). What happens if the many consent to ignore need (perceived balance) for want (suggested choices) by the few; which in return allows them to control the minds of the many through suggestion?
Whatever the "gov" is using therefore already implies submission of choice to choice of others; hence consenting to be within a sub/dom relationship.
resonant frequency
Resonance implies as choice to balance; which choice to choice implies dissonance (ignorance of resonance); while frequency (often repeated at short intervals) implies adaptation as choice to the ever changing moment (um) aka balance as form (life) within flow (inception towards death).
remote
Aka responding to EMO'TION, noun [Latin emotio; emoveo, to move from.]; which implies responding to ignorance of being moved as form within flow. Government (consent to the suggested will of others) is what allows the few to remote control the many.
Govern (to control) + ment (from mens; mind). What controls mind? Choice (in response to balance aka need/want). What happens if the many consent to ignore need (perceived balance) for want (suggested choices) by the few; which in return allows them to control the minds of the many through suggestion?
Whatever the "gov" is using therefore already implies submission of choice to choice of others; hence consenting to be within a sub/dom relationship.
Resonance implies as choice to balance; which choice to choice implies dissonance (ignorance of resonance); while frequency (often repeated at short intervals) implies adaptation as choice to the ever changing moment (um) aka balance as form (life) within flow (inception towards death).
Aka responding to EMO'TION, noun [Latin emotio; emoveo, to move from.]; which implies responding to ignorance of being moved as form within flow. Government (consent to the suggested will of others) is what allows the few to remote control the many.