This is the first i'm hearing about this, and it sounds like an interesting theory. I read up on it a little, but have two questions related to two real world experiments.
Galileo gravity experiment. Galileo dropped two objects shaped the same but weighing different amounts. Both objects landed on the ground that the same time. This experiment has been repeated countless times (including by me) and it never fails. If it's all buoyancy, why don't they fall at different rates due to their different densities?
Cavendish gravity experiment. Cavendish hung two massive lead balls from ropes and moved them close to each other to see if they were attracted to each other. They did attract, and it allowed him to experimentally work out the gravitational constant. Buoyancy here doesn't matter because the balls are hanging and the force is applied sideways. This experiment has also been repeated and improved on. If gravity doesn't exist, how were the lead balls attracted to each other?
This is the same article i read on a different site, and it doesn't answer either of the two questions i had.
However, something interesting from the article. The article mentions that NASA uses Boeing 737 airplanes to simulate zero-G, and this could disprove the existence of a space station. So they ADMIT that its possible to float for a brief amount of time. Answer me this:
How can the space station have 24/7 live streams if you only have chunks of 3 minutes of weightlessness? Did you watch the SpaceX live stream? That was 24 hours of footage that started while the rocket was on the ground and yet we see more than 3 minutes of weightlessness there in the rocket.
Why is the law of buoyancy ignored? A person is still heavier than air and the fact that the plane flies funny doesn't change that. The air and the person BOTH move in a parabola so if there is no gravity, a person should sink due to being more dense at all points in the parabola.
NASA can lie. I don't doubt that and some of their stuff can be fake. But, just because NASA lies doesn't prove the earth isn't round. However, thats not the point of this discussion which is gravity and buoyancy. Is there a real world experiment that disproves gravity? If you have one, id like to see it
Take a gander for yourself at a distant landmark 20kms or further
Bring optics for better results
The more distant the landmark the better
Pay attention and notice how you see 100% of the landmark as well as the ground leading up to it
Plug the distance into the earthcurvature.com calculator and then ask yourself why the distant object is fully in view, when it should be completely obscured due to the earths curve
This is the first i'm hearing about this, and it sounds like an interesting theory. I read up on it a little, but have two questions related to two real world experiments.
Galileo gravity experiment. Galileo dropped two objects shaped the same but weighing different amounts. Both objects landed on the ground that the same time. This experiment has been repeated countless times (including by me) and it never fails. If it's all buoyancy, why don't they fall at different rates due to their different densities?
Cavendish gravity experiment. Cavendish hung two massive lead balls from ropes and moved them close to each other to see if they were attracted to each other. They did attract, and it allowed him to experimentally work out the gravitational constant. Buoyancy here doesn't matter because the balls are hanging and the force is applied sideways. This experiment has also been repeated and improved on. If gravity doesn't exist, how were the lead balls attracted to each other?
http://flatearth101.com/gravity
This is the same article i read on a different site, and it doesn't answer either of the two questions i had.
However, something interesting from the article. The article mentions that NASA uses Boeing 737 airplanes to simulate zero-G, and this could disprove the existence of a space station. So they ADMIT that its possible to float for a brief amount of time. Answer me this:
I didn’t watch the livestream but if you want a compilation of nasa fails and contradictions there is plenty available on these communities
Have you considered the Coriolis effect?
The sniper that must account for the spin of the earth to hit their target?
Have you wondered why the same principle does not apply to airplanes, helicopters, hot air balloons or birds?
NASA can lie. I don't doubt that and some of their stuff can be fake. But, just because NASA lies doesn't prove the earth isn't round. However, thats not the point of this discussion which is gravity and buoyancy. Is there a real world experiment that disproves gravity? If you have one, id like to see it
Earthcurvature.com
Take a gander for yourself at a distant landmark 20kms or further
Bring optics for better results
The more distant the landmark the better
Pay attention and notice how you see 100% of the landmark as well as the ground leading up to it
Plug the distance into the earthcurvature.com calculator and then ask yourself why the distant object is fully in view, when it should be completely obscured due to the earths curve
Here is a video of a boat sailing away from the coast and "sinking" into the sea.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=3_TpeNZYTmw
I think it shows pretty clearly the curvature of the earth.