The great Barrington declaration is a joke. Literally any chucklefuck with internet access can sign it and claim to be a doctor. I just signed it right now as Dr Butt Snacks a PHD holder and medical practitioner from Missouri and it still went through lol. Don't believe me try it yourself on their website.
I will explain the point I was trying to make since you all predictably missed it. This GBR is easy to manipulate that means it can be manipulated by anyone for any reason. If you wanted to bolster your claims of herd immunity being widely accepted by the medical community for example wouldn't it be great if you could pad the stats and create thousands of signatures out of thin air from supposed MDs. Going the other way bad actors (like myself in the example) can file thousands of false signatures under obviously ridiculous names to discredit the GBR. My point is its a bad system they set up ripe for manipulation and therefore is suspect in either redirection whatever narrative you want to believe.
Nobody can alter the contents of the GBR, not even I.
I see what you are saying about fake identities. The fallacy here is called appeal to popularity. We can recognize this fallacy and assess the GBR for what it says rather than the number of people who support it.
Yeah this is the point I was trying to make and your position is very reasonable. To say it is a joke was perhaps a mistake on my part. More correct to say keep an open mind and understand that people want to manipulate us on multiple vectors. Checking sources and vetting information is important and often I see users on here believing things outright eith very sketchy proof or no proof at all. I agree with the majority of the user base on lockdowns being bad and I am anti mask/vaccine mandate. I personally took the vaccine but believe everyone should have that choice and anything else is government over reach. So it's funny I actually support the position of the GBR but due to the nature of the signatures am unsure how wide spread that belief is among medical practitioners of the west.
The great Barrington declaration is a joke. Literally any chucklefuck with internet access can sign it and claim to be a doctor. I just signed it right now as Dr Butt Snacks a PHD holder and medical practitioner from Missouri and it still went through lol. Don't believe me try it yourself on their website.
What makes it a joke besides the fact that some serious scientists didn't foresee unscrupulous pedophiles like yourself might fraudulently sign it?
Again, take your booster, keep your hands off children, and die screaming, bleeding from every orifice.
I will explain the point I was trying to make since you all predictably missed it. This GBR is easy to manipulate that means it can be manipulated by anyone for any reason. If you wanted to bolster your claims of herd immunity being widely accepted by the medical community for example wouldn't it be great if you could pad the stats and create thousands of signatures out of thin air from supposed MDs. Going the other way bad actors (like myself in the example) can file thousands of false signatures under obviously ridiculous names to discredit the GBR. My point is its a bad system they set up ripe for manipulation and therefore is suspect in either redirection whatever narrative you want to believe.
Nobody can alter the contents of the GBR, not even I.
I see what you are saying about fake identities. The fallacy here is called appeal to popularity. We can recognize this fallacy and assess the GBR for what it says rather than the number of people who support it.
Appeal to Popularity Fallacy: Definition & Examples https://study.com/academy/lesson/appeal-to-popularity-fallacy-definition-examples.html
Yeah this is the point I was trying to make and your position is very reasonable. To say it is a joke was perhaps a mistake on my part. More correct to say keep an open mind and understand that people want to manipulate us on multiple vectors. Checking sources and vetting information is important and often I see users on here believing things outright eith very sketchy proof or no proof at all. I agree with the majority of the user base on lockdowns being bad and I am anti mask/vaccine mandate. I personally took the vaccine but believe everyone should have that choice and anything else is government over reach. So it's funny I actually support the position of the GBR but due to the nature of the signatures am unsure how wide spread that belief is among medical practitioners of the west.