While I find the information interesting, and think it warrants more digging, the creator of the video isn't helping their case by making corrections and editing their conclusive numbers during the video.
As much as the numbers seem pretty compelling, making several corrections to numbers (and not using formulas) during the video, really kinda hurts the credibility of it.
My understanding is that quite a few of the lot numbers in VAERS are input with spaces and dashes etc that requires clean up for proper analysis- which is to be somewhat expected as VAERS is self reported so the fact he’s cleaning it up makes sense. But yeah it’s be better if he did it before.
The point of my comment wasn't as much about the presentation (although admittedly a part of it), as the fact that what's being presented doesn't match what was in the spreadsheets and there are "corrections" to the data being made while it's being presented. It's an issue about their preparation. It diminishes their credibility.
If someone is going to present conclusive data, they shouldn't be modifying it as they go. Quite frankly, it comes across as though they're making it up on the spot.
The cumulative values from multiple batches should have been coming from simple summation formulas referencing the source values. It's a spreadsheet. That's literally one of the simplest use cases for them.
"oops, Batch A should have been 12" edits cell
"oops, should have had Batch 14 included in this total" edits cell
If they're confident in their analysis, then they need to have this shit sorted out before presenting it.
While I find the information interesting, and think it warrants more digging, the creator of the video isn't helping their case by making corrections and editing their conclusive numbers during the video.
As much as the numbers seem pretty compelling, making several corrections to numbers (and not using formulas) during the video, really kinda hurts the credibility of it.
Seriously, start over and re-record it.
My understanding is that quite a few of the lot numbers in VAERS are input with spaces and dashes etc that requires clean up for proper analysis- which is to be somewhat expected as VAERS is self reported so the fact he’s cleaning it up makes sense. But yeah it’s be better if he did it before.
This guy did somewhat similar analysis:
https://market-ticker.org/akcs-www?post=244109
Yeah I can barely hear the audio.
In my experience, many analytical-minded people are terrible at presenting. Kinda have to put up with it if you want info straight from the source.
More discussion here: https://jessicar.substack.com/p/is-someone-staggering-the-more-toxic/comments
The point of my comment wasn't as much about the presentation (although admittedly a part of it), as the fact that what's being presented doesn't match what was in the spreadsheets and there are "corrections" to the data being made while it's being presented. It's an issue about their preparation. It diminishes their credibility.
If someone is going to present conclusive data, they shouldn't be modifying it as they go. Quite frankly, it comes across as though they're making it up on the spot.
The cumulative values from multiple batches should have been coming from simple summation formulas referencing the source values. It's a spreadsheet. That's literally one of the simplest use cases for them.
"oops, Batch A should have been 12" edits cell
"oops, should have had Batch 14 included in this total" edits cell
If they're confident in their analysis, then they need to have this shit sorted out before presenting it.
!!!!