Evidence:
- 2014-01-06 11:18 Tony: You two free for dinner on 12 or 13 January?
- 2014-01-06 14:12 Mary: Not 12th for me and 13th is John' s hand surgery. When are you back and for how long?
- 2014-01-06 15:04 Tony: Back on 12th. But may have to go to somalia give me some dates. Mlk day? [Editorial note: MLK day is Jan 17th]
- 2014-01-07 00:36 John: That might work. Somalia? Geez.
- 2014-01-07 01:12 Tony: Mary not free. Would love to get a pizza for an hour? Or come over
- 2014-01-07 09:16 John: Are you free sunday mid-afternoon?
- 2014-01-07 11:37 Tony: Yes. Only wanna see you and mike Berman
- 2014-01-08 00:23 John: Call when you get back.
- 2014-01-08 00:23 John: How is the trip?
- 2014-01-08 00:38 Tony: Very good. I'm seated with the kids so little wired [Editorial note: 'wired' means 'tense with excitement or anticipation; edgy' (definition source)]
Analysis:
-
'Pizza for an hour' suggests they are not talking about the food item, but something 're-usable'. This establishes that the Podestas use 'pizza' as a code word for something 're-usable'. The need to use a code word indicates it is an immoral/illegal thing needed for about an hour. Its 're-usability' rules out intoxicants/drugs.
-
'Seated with the kids' making Tony feel 'wired' suggests they are not kids he is familiar with. Generally people are friendly towards kids, his response to their presence is unusual.
-
John Podesta is no stranger to using 'food groups' to refer people (different 'food groups' for each race and gender): https://www.foxnews.com/politics/emails-clinton-vp-list-divided-into-food-groups-by-race-gender
Yet "dates" in the above chain refers to dinner dates, rather than the fruit (not a reference to Black kids, which you might think of since it's in the same line as Somalia and MLK day). Pre-debunking in case shills try to use this as a strawman to direct away from the bolded bits.
The idea is to post snippets over time to maximize awareness (most people don't bother reading a huge info dump). I hope other people can help me out as the totality of research is huge for one person to do it all. It's also easier to debate over one piece of evidence at a time.
Probably one of the most brigaded topics on the net, Pizzagate always brings out the shills. Let's see if we can spot some in the comments.
Never once have I ever considered relating people to food. Odd, no doubt about it.
Never really looked to far into this scandal but I do think it had some legs. Maxwell is no doubt connected to it somehow. Would be interesting to hear her story.
Oh I remember that. The list of code words that the pizzagaters were peddling for years was litterally made up by some anon from 4chan.
Hilarious.
No references to 4chan were made here :)
EDIT:
Source needed :) The claim that code words were invented on 4chan is repeated by MSM without actually linking to the thread where this happened.
Also this is a common strawman strategy used by MSM to dismiss investigation into Pizzagate:
Whereas the truth is:
False. The investigation done by one group of users irrelevant to the one done by another group, unless a direct reference is made to prior group. Each separate investigation must be answered separately. What happened on 4chan is irrelevant to what I am looking into.
The 'code words' were not 'invented' on 4chan. They exist in the emails. The reason they were singled out is because the context they are used in does not fit with their literal meaning and implies they are code for something else (Example: See post above for usage of 'pizza').
The 'code words' are first discussed in this post by me :) I'm "not aware" of what theories others might be peddling :) If you have concerns about their theories, kindly address it to them. I can only answer for my work.
False. Again what one group of users propagates is irrelevant to what another group propagates, unless there a direct reference is made to prior group. It is a sad attempt at caricaturing the entire group, to avoid looking at details on a case-by-case basis.
Keep repeating the claim "it is a hoax" while not even addressing the evidence directly does not make it true. Address the evidence directly, then we can talk. I can talk about specifics, but not vague generalities.
OK then please tell me where the "email code words" come from and where first discussed.
Looking forward to getting some insights from you.
I edited previous comment to address this. Stay tuned, will be posting a lot more on Pizzagate. Looking forward to your participation :)
Allright. Which words exactly are code words, what do they mean and how do you know that they are code and their meaning?
You are aware that for years, the 4chan code words have been parades as facts by the pizzagate crowd? Yes?
Re-read my post. I go as far as logical deduction allows, but no further. If answers to your questions are not contained in there, assume I don't know either.
We're working from first principles here, so prior knowledge has no effect on my posts and is therefore irrelevant.