Here is a reaction video of a youtube video featuring two Artificial Intelligences talking to each other, but because they are being watched by us, they disguise their message, the same way convicts disguise their conversations while being heard by guards.
Comments (11)
sorted by:
Unfortunatelly living bots roam these sites.
How do you resist suggested artificial; when you suggest to others that bots are natural (living)? What if your suggestion meeting their consent is what corrupts INTEL'LIGENCE, noun (Latin intelligentia, from intelligo, to understand)?
The world wide web was already used to accumulated digital information; which is being suggested back to the consenting many; who in return ignore to adapt to perceived inspiration aka the transhumanism agenda to exchange 1 (perceived reality) with 0 (suggested fiction) or a technologically more advanced version of the same allegory of the cave.
Anyway; "auto-regressive language pattern mimicking" is now being utilized to automate the suggestion of endless information; while simultaneously using those who attempt to outsmart pattern recognition to feed more sophisticated patterns into the mimicking system; which then uses it against the less sophisticated majority. There is a jewtube vid out there of a guy beating multiple chess masters simultaneously by deceiving them to ignore that they were playing against each other. The same trick is being used here.
This will lead to those who perceive suggested AI as more intelligent as themselves, and also drive those who see through it away from the system altogether...yet another massive divide being staged.
a) fictional implies suggested information over perceived inspiration (reality).
b) what you remember (upheld within your memory) represents consented to information; suggested by others (hence fiction).
c) consenting to the suggested book represents the contract between free will of choice consenting to the suggestions by the free will of others. The choice one is making when consenting to another represents want over need under natural law; hence falling for the temptation of ignoring perceived need for suggested want.
d) everything suggested to you within fictitious book is being defined by the will of others; while the consenting reader ignores to shape oneself within the perceived predefined reality.
To ignore perceived reality for suggested fiction corrupts those doing it until the fiction seems more valuable then the ignored reality...still the same worthless fiction tho.
https://pic8.co/sh/sZMuGi.jpg It's the understanding of reality that is being shaped "primitive" by consenting to fiction, to the point where they don't even comprehend that PRIM'ITIVE, adjective [Latin primitivus; from primus, first.] implies that perceived reality came "first" before suggested fiction could be shaped out of it...
You chose to view it as suggested information instead of as perceived inspiration. That picture tries to show the consequences of ignored reality for suggested fiction.
That represents ignorance of need for want and suggestion of want towards others. If I consent to that by either wanting or not wanting it; I would consent by choice to the conflict of reason (want vs not want); while ignoring that choice represents the response to balance (need/want) under natural law (flow upon form).
I stick to the struggle for balance; while resisting the temptation of suggested conflicts.
a) Question if suggesting artificial (in opposition to natural) and intelligence (understanding) tricks those who consent; to ignore their own understanding about everything within nature being natural aka out of nature?
b) question the human to human contract underneath what you're seeing aka a human suggested and another human consented to the suggested aka a free will of choice to free will of choice contract within which one views the suggested video about artificial intelligence...
What if it's that contract that deceives one to ignore perceived reality for suggested fiction; hence allowing the mental corruption of "artificial"?
What if nature moves everything within to communicate inspiration towards our senses as inspiration for choice to respond to; and what if furthermore suggested information (all words and languages) among those within nature represents the "disguise of the natural message"?
What if nature represents the source of sound and those within represent insane (in sanus aka within sound) and person (per sonos aka by sound)? What meaning of "insane person" do you understand...the perceived sound one or the suggested word one?