Lin Wood recorded a message in which Michael Flynn stated adamantly that he believes Q is a CIA disinformation campaign. Yesterday, I started reading reading John Coleman's "Conspirators' Hierarchy" in which he states:
I pursued my investigations, pressing on in the face of severe risks, attacks on myself and my wife, financial losses, continual harassment, threats and calumny, all part of a carefully-crafted and orchestrated program to discredit me, run by government agents and informers, embedded in the so-called Christian rightwing, the "Identity Movement" and rightwing "patriotic" groups. These agents operated, and still operate, under cover of strong and fearless outspoken opposition to Judaism their main enemy, they would have us believe.
To me, just the way it played out, it seems clear that Q is a psy op being used to distract us. From what? Personally, I believe there is dominionist conspiracy to trash the Constitution and do away with our freedoms and liberties. Notice how strong the Christian rightwing that Coleman warned us of, is within this current movement, including Q and the bogus "stop the steal" movement.
What do you all think?
I guess I don't understand what you mean by "legit."
For me, "Q is legit" would mean: *there was an insider who posted on a forum website as "Q" who had special knowledge of events occurring within the government, including a widespread investigation of Democrats that would result in some kind of prosecution that would happen in one big event called the Storm."
If all that were true, then Q is legit. If Q is not an insider with special knowledge etc,etc, then Q is something not legit whether a larp or a disinformation campaign.
Yeah anyone calling Q "legit" is either in on the con, or has velcro for shoelaces.
why do you have to spend so much energy telling people something is fake lmao fake stuff goes away on its own lmao keep glowing glowfaggot
What does "Q was reciprocated at the highest levels of the Trump admin" mean?
One thing comes to mind.
There was a pic of Barr on the back of a c130? sitting locked in with the doors in sight. This was when he was coming back from Alaska. This was real and top level.
There many examples of this.This means they were in sinister mode fucking with us, not a larp.
That was a public event. We already know who Q was.
So 7 minutes and the narrator has referred to several "coincidences." One was that Trump shortened the word "quarters" to Qs for a 24 character limit tweet. The narrator even says it would be necessary to shorten the word, but still counts it as a coincidence. This was a coincidence because it was on the same day of Qs "first" post (but was it really?). At the time of Q's first post, no one knew who Q was. It wouldn't make sense for Trump to use the letter to make some signal at this time. The tweet also mentions a "hurricane," as a form of "storm," but of course this was because there was a hurricane.So how did they manage to plan a hurricane at the same time as this "coincidence?" Or maybe it is just all a coincidence. The quarter reports came out and Trump tweeted about it, shortening the word quarter to Q, shortly after there really was a hurricane. There is literally nothing extraordinary about that.
Next, the narrator talks about Trump releasing all the JFK files (which he didn't follow through on) and that all conspiracies would be answered. We're still waiting for that.
The first thing, though, of course, was the infamous "calm before the storm" incoherent statement Trump made, promising we'd all find out soon what the "storm" was. We're still waiting. This reminds me of how Jesus promised the end times to come within the lifetimes of the apostles, which of course didn't happen forcing later writers to reinterpret his meaning. Trump's words and all these "coincidences" (which really are coincidences) have to get reinterpreted over and over again.
This is a bad start. Sort of like reading John Coleman's Hierarchy of Conspiracies. A phenomenal waste of time. And I'd go through the whole thing and debunk it step by step and it wouldn't matter to you at all. It's all false. I mean, all conspiracies are built on some foundation of truth but extend beyond what evidence supports to where believers have to have faith in what they believe in. This conspiracy is exactly the same.
If you think there is something really worthwhile, can you give me timestamps. So far, nothing in this video has panned out. You should rewatch it with a critical eye. Have you had to alter your beliefs to keep believing in this stuff over time? Don't you think that indicates you're deluding yourself?
He asked you a direct question and you gave him a link to bullshute.
As I just mentioned, 2 types of QTards: Those in on the con, and those who wear bibs and helmets. Which one are you?