Is this the statue that was legally secured in perpetuity in exchange for the family to pay for it to be built and to give up the land on which it was placed?
No, that was the one in Richmond I believe. I think that family folded for money in the end anyway. Or got steamrolled by the state. I can’t remember, but it’s gone now
Historical revisionism represents a suggested -ism; causing a conflict of reason between two parties; now look at the other picture...REFEREE', noun - "appointed by a court to hear, examine and decide a cause between parties".
The appointing Court; noun - "formed assembly held by a sovereign" represents an allegory for form within flow; which implies form to be within the balance (momentum) of flow; a balance defining natural opposites; such as black/white. The masons of free will inverted choice responding to balance; by suggesting balance (referee) in-between choices (want vs not want aka winning or losing the game).
As for the first picture...notice the suggested temptation of loss (statue) in the foreground; the looming outcome of death (cross) in the background, and the ignored balance (growth of trees) in-between?
Turned in a basketball, no doubt.
fuck what this country has become. i hope it falls
Is this the statue that was legally secured in perpetuity in exchange for the family to pay for it to be built and to give up the land on which it was placed?
No, that was the one in Richmond I believe. I think that family folded for money in the end anyway. Or got steamrolled by the state. I can’t remember, but it’s gone now
Historical revisionism represents a suggested -ism; causing a conflict of reason between two parties; now look at the other picture...REFEREE', noun - "appointed by a court to hear, examine and decide a cause between parties".
The appointing Court; noun - "formed assembly held by a sovereign" represents an allegory for form within flow; which implies form to be within the balance (momentum) of flow; a balance defining natural opposites; such as black/white. The masons of free will inverted choice responding to balance; by suggesting balance (referee) in-between choices (want vs not want aka winning or losing the game).
As for the first picture...notice the suggested temptation of loss (statue) in the foreground; the looming outcome of death (cross) in the background, and the ignored balance (growth of trees) in-between?