Supreme Court To Hear Case Tomorrow That Will Overturn Roe v. Wade
(christiannewsjournal.com)
Comments (17)
sorted by:
they ain't going to overturn shit, it's a puppet show, and the puppets know if they don't do what they're told that there will just be 15 or 20 or 45 puppets instead of 9.
Doubt it, although I wish it was banned
Christcucks truly believe that banning democrats getting abortions will make more Republicans. With participation in Christianity decreasing exponentially year after year, this hail Mary will surely backfire and make many more democrats, if they are successful in overturning roe v wade.
Fun fact: crime rates plummetted in the generation following roe v wades implementation.
I dont think they care so much about making more republicans, its more about stopping what they believe to be state sponsored mass murder
It's also the backdoor to ending medical privacy but never let common sense get in the way
I think we’re far beyond having any medical privacy this year
Genuine question, do you have a single source that suggests a causal link between Roe V Wade and crime stats? I ask because that seems like a pretty silly argument without evidence. Especially given the fact that the decades that followed Roe V Wade saw huge expansions in crime fighting organizations and laws that expanded many mandates for policing. Not only at the local level either. The ATF was only founded one year earlier and the DEA was founded that same year. The RICO act was only passed three years prior and wasn't being used to combat organized crime yet. At least not en masse. So please, cite some sources for the causal link between Roe V Wade and crime.
Sure do: https://www.prb.org/resources/new-study-claims-abortion-is-behind-decrease-in-crime/
Are you arguing in favor of in utero death sentences for misdemeanor and minor felony offenses before they're even committed or proven? That's some real futuristic shit right there.
Okay so I just read your "citation" and I'm a bit confused. This isn't a study. Its not even really an informative article. Its opinion piece about a study that was done and it doesn't even break down the information in any meaningful way. There isn't much in the of reference to data in the study either. Half of it is about peoples reactions to the actual study Not sure why you bothered to link it. I pulled up the actual study and I gonna read that instead. Link if you want it: https://pricetheory.uchicago.edu/levitt/Papers/DonohueLevittTheImpactOfLegalized2001.pdf
This is gonna take me a bit to read since it has quite a bit of information in it. I'll get back to you when I'm done.
You asked for a source, I obliged. Thanks for taking the time to read. I'm positive I can find many others if this doesn't fit your parameters.
Then do so
It is like that Louis CK bit.. "If you just think it is a clump of cells of course you dont care, and if you think it is a baby of course you are outraged by it"
No. Republicans? Democrats? Voting died in 20.
Christians believe every body has a soul , before birth, worth saving.
Obviously, they need the dead baby blood for their rituals to keep stupidity abundant. So, it would never shut down. Just another distraction.
No it’s about saving human lives and inching humanity’s callous disregard for life back a little.