No it is not a TELL. The difference between rGO and GhO is very very difficult to detect even analytically, unless you know what you are doing and have millions worth of lab gear.
Dr Pablo Campra (Almeria University, Spain) got down to the level of graphene-oxide in his spectral analysis (very close match), but was most likely missing hydrogen ions (i.e. graphene-hydr-oxide). Noack provided the missing piece, as he knew the spectrum from his previous work.
In the end it makes very little difference, rGO or GhO: both are toxic, cause bleeding and can be used for nano-assembly (of many things).
In his speech, he tells that the ingredient they intentionally include and list is graphene oxide. Graphene hyroxide was found by spectography. I missed the name of the person who did the spectography. We should try and find that report.
This is graphene hydroxide. Lots of bots on reddit and twitter were dismissing this by referring to graphene oxide. That's a tell.
No it is not a TELL. The difference between rGO and GhO is very very difficult to detect even analytically, unless you know what you are doing and have millions worth of lab gear.
Dr Pablo Campra (Almeria University, Spain) got down to the level of graphene-oxide in his spectral analysis (very close match), but was most likely missing hydrogen ions (i.e. graphene-hydr-oxide). Noack provided the missing piece, as he knew the spectrum from his previous work.
In the end it makes very little difference, rGO or GhO: both are toxic, cause bleeding and can be used for nano-assembly (of many things).
In his speech, he tells that the ingredient they intentionally include and list is graphene oxide. Graphene hyroxide was found by spectography. I missed the name of the person who did the spectography. We should try and find that report.