ALL is offered to each ONE within (perception); each of us represents ONE within ALL. Everything is woven together.
I think I see your point
A point implies your want for outcome; which ignores that a) outcome is predefined as death at inception for the life in-between and b) in-between implies being within balance; hence having the responding free will of choice.
Resist the temptation to want to understand the information suggested by others; and instead try to adapt based on your own understanding to whatever inspires you. I'm not the teacher for reality; just an expression of reality as both inspiration (choice of need) and temptation (choice of want) to others.
I think I see your point but can you elaborate? Some more context would be helpful.
ALL is offered to each ONE within (perception); each of us represents ONE within ALL. Everything is woven together.
A point implies your want for outcome; which ignores that a) outcome is predefined as death at inception for the life in-between and b) in-between implies being within balance; hence having the responding free will of choice.
Resist the temptation to want to understand the information suggested by others; and instead try to adapt based on your own understanding to whatever inspires you. I'm not the teacher for reality; just an expression of reality as both inspiration (choice of need) and temptation (choice of want) to others.
What do you mean by that?
Less requested information; more shaping of adaptable inspiration. Try putting some understanding into something; and watch how others shape it.
How do I do that?